If Purity doesn't play a part then why do the vast majority of people on here test their product before attempting ctb? Why does PPH & stan recommend a purity of 95% or above?
What you have to remember is even though a product might say purity of 99.8% on the packaging. That is no guartunee that what is inside the packaging is still 99.8%. That was the case in that IC case I posted above along with this supplier (PC);
https://sanctioned-suicide.net/threads/do-not-buy-or-use-pro-cure-sn.116488/#post-2022369 Here is a quote from post #6 in that thread;
"PC claims 99% nitrite, but multiple accounts of members experiencing symptoms of NITRATE poisoning."
Also
@Anon1337 said earlier, it is unheard of for someone NOT to go unconscious after taking 21g's of SN. Then OP said this;
Having read 100's of cases, I certainly can't recall anything similar to the above without either user error or the product not being SN. As I said earlier, would welcome to be proven wrong so we can all learn for our own ctb attempts. Another reason why I, like others here, are a little sceptical (again happy to be proven wrong on that) are small comments like the below;
The bolded text above contradicts itself. Also numerous people beforehand have described the taste of SN as like "seawater". i.e. very salty. I wouldn't describe seawater as "bitter" or "disgusting salt" as sea water is supposed to be fresh salt.
How old was OP when attempting? Why are they being so defensive now that people are suggesting possible reasons why they could have failed? Why did they originally post a thread title which came across as fear mongering?