Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC):
Ethereum (ETH):
Monero (XMR):
N from D megathread
Thread starterMeretlein
Start date
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
There's a pretty basic video tutorial that PN posted. You can find it on exit International website, vimeo and possibly youtube (unless it got removed). It just requires a nail scissor. Though you need to be careful not to accidentally cut yourself.
Thingd are, and will be no different to before. Basically it gets published in the ppeh (now essentials) and eventually, if possible, we get a copy pinned for download in the suicide disccusion section of the forum. The restrictions for accessing legitimate copies has akeays been 50yrs old +. Nothing's changed. Whilst there will be people who have it earlier than others and subsequently posting on the matter this has always been the case. It's not an elite club or two tiered system. Just the unfortunate nature of things.
We may have to agree to disagree. Although unrelated to N, but still a parallel; I lost count of threads started by members claiming they'd found an SN source, only to then make cryptic remarks and act evasively like an elite club.
I'm well aware of the age requirement and the difficulty in obtaining the new edition, which is why some are on tenterhooks at the moment. I repeat that I hope a two-tier system doesn't arise, as one did develop before the scammer London was banned. I would say much has changed. The email addresses from the November 2021 and April 2022 PPH are null; most likely being used by scammers, as you've pointed out previously, despite one of the mods (RainAndSadness) temporarily updating the Resources section to signpost members to the November 2021 PPH edition to contact D.
However, this is déjà vu of when A ceased trading and D emerged.
Are there any downsides to using a pseudoname as the recipient of the package? To avoid legal repercussions, I would like to avoid any evidence that the package is imported by me. I believe one downside is that I would need to pay for 2 shipments rather than 1, since a package containing 2 N bottles would cost more than $800 (duty free threshold for USA), and it would be 'held at customs' until I paid the customs duty, and I don't think there is any way to pay customs duty anonymously. Is there any other downsides to using a pseudoname?
Also, does D still require that we show them proof of purchase of PPeH?
As someone who has bought a lot of shit of the dark net , it's recommended / pretty much a rule that you always use your real name. It sends a read flag to the letter carrier and possibly post office.
Reactions:
MountainMonkey, rationaltake, betternever2havbeen and 2 others
Are there any downsides to using a pseudoname as the recipient of the package? To avoid legal repercussions, I would like to avoid any evidence that the package is imported by me. I believe one downside is that I would need to pay for 2 shipments rather than 1, since a package containing 2 N bottles would cost more than $800 (duty free threshold for USA), and it would be 'held at customs' until I paid the customs duty, and I don't think there is any way to pay customs duty anonymously. Is there any other downsides to using a pseudoname?
Also, does D still require that we show them proof of purchase of PPeH?
D doesn't require you to provide proof of purchase for the PPH. PN just says that so he can sell more books.
You should use your real name when you order. It will look more suspicious if you order something under a fake name. The post office already knows the names of everyone who lives at your address. It will raise a red flag if a package is sent to a person who doesn't exist. You have plausible deniability. If anyone asks about the package, just deny that you ordered it.
Reactions:
damaged_soul, NearlyIrrelevantCake, Hangnail and 2 others
D doesn't require you to provide proof of purchase for the PPH. PN just says that so he can sell more books.
You should use your real name when you order. It will look more suspicious if you order something under a fake name. The post office already knows the names of everyone who lives at your address. It will raise a red flag if a package is sent to a person who doesn't exist. You have plausible deniability. If anyone asks about the package, just deny that you ordered it.
Oh ok. No wonder PN took out that statement in the new edition lol.
When I am using my real name as the recipient, is it still important that I use my real address (eg. rather than virtual forwarding service or something similar)? I'm concerned about law enforcement showing up at the door if the package is seized by customs. I don't see how there is any plausible deniability if the package shows my real name and residential address. I have no way of explaining the situation to my parents should this happen and my CTB plans will be completely screwed
2 should be enough, I suppose you can use 3 if you want to be sure. Zofran is better than nothing. A bunch of people successfully ctb with N without an AE
D no longer supplies, not at least from the email he used to. You can check the latest pages on this thread to understand the issue: It will probably take long before we get a safe new supplier or recover D as a supplier.
In order to use PMs you need more messages, it was 15 or 20 more or less I think.
D no longer supplies, not at least from the email he used to. You can check the latest pages on this thread to understand the issue: It will probably take long before we get a safe new supplier or recover D as a supplier.
In order to use PMs you need more messages, it was 15 or 20 more or less I think.
Oh, you mean i need to send 20 public messages before i could pm?
Also, there was this post with precise instructions to a confused member about using SN without problems. I saved it, but the link is now invalid. Could anyone familiar with the post refer me to it? It was a long, very well written note on that subject. Thank you.
It seems there are quite a few desperate people who are trying to buy N from D and may be falling for the same scammer that has been sharing fake contact emails for D since at least April. Either by DM through this forum or via a fake PPeH copy.
I tried recently, the package arrived to my country, they kept requesting clearance information from sender for two weeks - seems that either D never responded or never submitted the required information in the first place, so the package was given a different tracking number and returned (here the clearance information is received and it goes back to the sender, but never picked up and destroyed). Now the same email is not in use. I had to try, but this does not seem super reliable, I wouldn't count on this as my last option.
I tried recently, the package arrived to my country, they kept requesting clearance information from sender for two weeks - seems that either D never responded or never submitted the required information in the first place, so the package was given a different tracking number and returned (here the clearance information is received and it goes back to the sender, but never picked up and destroyed). Now the same email is not in use. I had to try, but this does not seem super reliable, I wouldn't count on this as my last option.
I tried recently, the package arrived to my country, they kept requesting clearance information from sender for two weeks - seems that either D never responded or never submitted the required information in the first place, so the package was given a different tracking number and returned (here the clearance information is received and it goes back to the sender, but never picked up and destroyed). Now the same email is not in use. I had to try, but this does not seem super reliable, I wouldn't count on this as my last option.
That's extremely upsetting and frustrating. I'm so sorry you had that experience. It's been a bit wonky since May/June. And then in August clearly the end of the process as we knew it.
Reactions:
rationaltake, Hangnail and chronicphysicalpain
This thread here is a great example that shows how one (or two cooperating) scammers are able to play people.
First ask a simple question, claim to be looking for help, intensify the panic and at some point a "white knight" seems to appear who secretly shared the new email for D via DM.
But "shhhhhh it's a secret".
These scammers are certainly not dumb and know how to play with people's minds and fears.
Don't fall for it.
Thread 'not reply from D'
https://sanctioned-suicide.net/threads/not-reply-from-d.96864/
Reactions:
Shivali, Hangnail, rationaltake and 5 others
So dsupply****@proton is a scam email? This is the email that I've found in April's version of PPH in this forum. Someone should delete it since it's is a scam.
So dsupply****@proton is a scam email? This is the email that I've found in April's version of PPH in this forum. Someone should delete it since it's is a scam.
So dsupply****@proton is a scam email? This is the email that I've found in April's version of PPH in this forum. Someone should delete it since it's is a scam.
It's already been established that the April email is no longer valid. We're waiting to find out if there is a new email in the September Essentials which has replaced the PPeH.
Reactions:
blue_muse, Hangnail, wljourney and 1 other person
So dsupply****@proton is a scam email? This is the email that I've found in April's version of PPH in this forum. Someone should delete it since it's is a scam.
So dsupply****@proton is a scam email? This is the email that I've found in April's version of PPH in this forum. Someone should delete it since it's is a scam.
That's an old legitimate email address that has since been disbanded. It's not in use but someone will take it and use it to scam now. Unfortunately deleting the whole document would mean losing all that info foe the sake of getting rid of the email address. Maybe it can be wdited out manually with soneone with more technical know how.
This is a very fluid situation right now and I am waiting to hear more from our mods.
But yes. It appears that the "essentials" had a functioning, valid email for D posted for a few days. Then it changed.
This may be the new business model D is following to keep access to his products tighter restricted to Exit members only.
The current developments are indeed concerning. They state in the PPH Essentials that the email address is changing frequently "because of repeated attempts of scam". But a frequent change of email addresses as it's happening right now only benefits scammers because it causes confusion and uncertainty, as we can see in this thread. So that explanation isn't very plausible. My theory: they didn't like that people got that information for free, after all, the content of the PPH is their business model. And I think this is just their new strategy to force people to sign up to the Exit Essentials, introducing a frequent change of email addresses. Think about it. D is doing that so Exit receives more profit when people are forced to subscribe to the Essentials to see his email address and Exit advertises D because that's why people buy the PPH in the first place. Win-win situation. And it indicates that they're both working together closer than we thought. But the explanation addressing 'attempted scams' doesn't make any sense. The free PPH copy that was uploaded to this forum prevented scamming. That was the entire purpose.
Reactions:
SproutPony, damaged_soul, Mary5689 and 13 others
The current developments are indeed concerning. They state in the PPH Essentials that the email address is changing frequently "because of repeated attempts of scam". But a frequent change of email addresses as it's happening right now only benefits scammers because it causes confusion and uncertainty, as we can see in this thread. So that explanation isn't very plausible. My theory: they didn't like that people got that information for free, after all, the content of the PPH is their business model. And I think this is just their new strategy to force people to sign up to the Exit Essentials, introducing a frequent change of email addresses. Think about it. D is doing that so Exit receives more profit when people are forced to subscribe to the Essentials to see his email address and Exit advertises D because that's why people buy the PPH in the first place. Win-win situation. And it indicates that they're both working together closer than we thought. But the explanation addressing 'attempted scams' doesn't make any sense. The free PPH copy that was uploaded to this forum prevented scamming. That was the entire purpose.
This makes sense. It says on the Exit website that the Essentials is being updated every month. The methods aren't going to need updating that often! I wonder what the deal between D and PN is behind the scenes. Exit is targeting a monied élite. You are so right about it being a business.
Reactions:
damaged_soul, Mary5689, Disappointered and 5 others
The current developments are indeed concerning. They state in the PPH Essentials that the email address is changing frequently "because of repeated attempts of scam". But a frequent change of email addresses as it's happening right now only benefits scammers because it causes confusion and uncertainty, as we can see in this thread. So that explanation isn't very plausible. My theory: they didn't like that people got that information for free, after all, the content of the PPH is their business model. And I think this is just their new strategy to force people to sign up to the Exit Essentials, introducing a frequent change of email addresses. Think about it. D is doing that so Exit receives more profit when people are forced to subscribe to the Essentials to see his email address and Exit advertises D because that's why people buy the PPH in the first place. Win-win situation. And it indicates that they're both working together closer than we thought. But the explanation addressing 'attempted scams' doesn't make any sense. The free PPH copy that was uploaded to this forum prevented scamming. That was the entire purpose.
Yeah, it's a total business move and I think it tips EXIT and PN in the line of fire for legal issues personally because there's no longer plausible deniability. They clearly have a business arrangement when the only place that can get regular updates with/access to that address is Exit. Fuck them. They're painting themselves into litigation corner. When that goes tits up either D will be caught or (perhaps more likely) he will resurface in the only other place he can find the same kind of turn around. We all know where that is. In fact I suspect his income will split in half during the period we have no access.
Last edited:
Reactions:
IMq2BqnTmLMG, Mixo, MountainMonkey and 3 others
The current developments are indeed concerning. They state in the PPH Essentials that the email address is changing frequently "because of repeated attempts of scam". But a frequent change of email addresses as it's happening right now only benefits scammers because it causes confusion and uncertainty, as we can see in this thread. So that explanation isn't very plausible. My theory: they didn't like that people got that information for free, after all, the content of the PPH is their business model. And I think this is just their new strategy to force people to sign up to the Exit Essentials, introducing a frequent change of email addresses. Think about it. D is doing that so Exit receives more profit when people are forced to subscribe to the Essentials to see his email address and Exit advertises D because that's why people buy the PPH in the first place. Win-win situation. And it indicates that they're both working together closer than we thought. But the explanation addressing 'attempted scams' doesn't make any sense. The free PPH copy that was uploaded to this forum prevented scamming. That was the entire purpose.
Thank you for the updates.
I'd like to know, the Essentials will be published sooner or later here on the forum? Since you're telling that they keep updating and changing the editions, would it be useless to publish the document here (if it's going to change in a month)?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.