You can go years without sex. Try the same without water.
Yes, I did a bad job of explaining myself in this thread. I don't want to write those page-long dissertations in every thread where I try to say something.
I'm curious, what is the reason behind even writing this? I know that you can survive without sex, my first comment was about how it's not even sex that's the problem for me. You know that I know this. What is the point you're making, then? That never having had a romantic relationship is less lethal than dehydration? You know that everyone knows that. I have no idea at all why you wrote this reply.
The whole point of using water is to illustrate both that it doesn't matter unless you really lack it (no real taste, nothing special, most people drink it all of the time); and also that your other problems still remain after you've taken care of your dehydration. This will go over everyone's heads unless you spell it out in pages upon pages of mentally exhausting tedium.
I'm sure the people that have seen some of my other posts know what I meant. And they would also know that there's more to back up my views than what I wrote here. This is why I don't want to write brief comments anymore (only jokes or pure vents are safe from this); if you post something that isn't an entire essay covering all of the nuances, you'll get hit by this sort of nitpicking. If it's a "controversial" topic, then forget about posting one or two sentences unless you want long back-and-forths where you have to explain the entire universe in order to not get called a misogynist or whatever.
I also do this to people all of the time, since it's just too much work to actually understand what someone is thinking. If I were perfect, I guess I'd constantly be wary of what I don't know and ask questions instead of assuming stuff. In some cases it's impossible to get the whole story without asking a bunch of questions (only have one short post to go from). Think this format just isn't good for certain kinds of dialogue (complicated, heavily subjective topics). In comparison, IRL talks combined with writing (keeping things on track, remembering points, etc) I think is better at those things. Best might be writing entire books and reviewing each other's work, in combination with long IRL talks with plenty of time to think, at all times. Needless to say, that's not realistic here.
This has got to be the last fucking shitty online discussion I ever get into. I've done tens of these on here, it's completely pointless. Well, my entire life is pointless, but it doesn't make sense to sit here and have mild to moderate stress levels due to someone not understanding me and feeling like I have to write paragraphs upon paragraphs to finally feel like I'm done with this. Some half-assed thing I wrote months ago is getting dug up, nothing new and no end to it.
If your larger point is that "sex doesn't fix depression" (barely anyone disagrees with this sentence, taken literally and without addendums), try reading the posts in this thread. There happens to be a solid analysis from Makko on the first page.
In order to stick to my own values, then. I would again ask: Why did you post this? What is the point you're getting at?