The site you linked is a random page with absolutely no credentials. Several of the links are to pages that admit they are against all sex work, and they don't include any peer-reviewed research or valid findings of any kind. For a source to have any merit it needs to be a *credible* source, because people can say anything on the internet. So instead of the random site you linked, how about one of the world's oldest, most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals like
The Lancet? The Thomas Reuter's Foundation, another respected organization that works with news and media outlets around the world, summarizes the findings in
this handy article if you don't have an account at The Lancet (they're free to make, btw). In debunking the myths it clearly states their research found most sex workers are *not* being trafficked.
However, in my very first comment I made sure to note that I was referring to adult, consensual sex work. Sex trafficking is a completely different subject, but you keep insisting that a massive majority of "these women" (credible links will also teach you that it's not only women who are sex workers) are forced to be there. Which is an even odder thing, because you call them nasty, say they're sucked dry, all this demeaning language, while simultaneously saying they were all forced into it as minors? If we assume you believe what you say, then you talk about underage abuse victims in an extremely disgusting way.
If you truly wanted to learn, you could do that on your own, so I'm not going to spend time further on this conversation. Accurate information is available on reputable sites and in peer-reviewed journals. If you'd rather Google a phrase that involves the word "prostitute" after I already explained that's a slur and click on whatever pops up, that's your choice. For the record, it's of course fine to disagree with someone's personal choices; that's why it's their life and not yours. But that doesn't mean you get to make up facts just because you don't like how they live their life.