Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC):
Ethereum (ETH):
Monero (XMR):
N from D megathread
Thread starterMeretlein
Start date
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Also, I've read of an user who gained access to the Essentials (september edition) but apparently the email provided on the book wasn't the right one. Does anybody know why/have any idea?
because it lists an email and then says "it is currently not available".
And when you try to send an email to the address it shows up as "account does not exist"
I've posted about this many times in the thread above and nothing has changed yet.
Nobody can currently get in touch with D. At least not through the email that was published.
There are however already scammers out there who have slightly modified the "new" email address and are claiming to be D.
There is an alternative. SN can be delivered straight into the bloodstream via a needle or IV. No nausea. No need for more drugs. Just putting it out there.
I'm sure there is. If not on SaSu, certainly on the Internet in general. I'm sure it could be practiced first to get the hang of it. I've never done it, never had a desire to do it, but I'm sure I could learn, if necessary, just like anyone else, if SN were going to be my method.
There is an alternative. SN can be delivered straight into the bloodstream via a needle or IV. No nausea. No need for more drugs. Just putting it out there.
Off hand, I can't say I know of any studies or research on it. But, I see no reason why it wouldn't be possible. For the cyanide treatment, a much lesser dose than the lethal amount is administered. I can't fathom why a lethal dose administered through the bloodstream would not be successful. Basically, it's just skipping the absorption process.
My plan is to leave like in 9-12 months, it will all depend on whether N is available at the moment or i will have to switch to SN which i don't think is a bad idea if N is not available.
Also, I've read of an user who gained access to the Essentials (september edition) but apparently the email provided on the book wasn't the right one. Does anybody know why/have any idea?
Have you heard more about this? I don't have access to PPeH but on the access page there is a slight exploit such that if you know a term you can see if it's in the PDF. Someone gave me the email and I verified that it is in PPeH September using the search exploit. Is it a scam even though its in there?
Have you heard more about this? I don't have access to PPeH but on the access page there is a slight exploit such that if you know a term you can see if it's in the PDF. Someone gave me the email and I verified that it is in PPeH September using the search exploit. Is it a scam even though its in there?
Yes, they included a new email address, however it says right afterwards "this is unconfirmed".
- It seems that this email may be a new supplier, but it doesn't seem to be D
- The email may be removed soon, since Exit hasn't been able to validate it as a reliable/trustworthy source.
To be honest I am a bit surprised how this could have made it into the "book" without prior validation.
Reactions:
MountainMonkey, damaged_soul and rationaltake
Yes, they included a new email address, however it says right afterwards "this is unconfirmed".
- It seems that this email may be a new supplier, but it doesn't seem to be D
- The email may be removed soon, since Exit hasn't been able to validate it as a reliable/trustworthy source.
To be honest I am a bit surprised how this could have made it into the "book" without prior validation.
Yeah, as THE reputed source in this arena, they should hold themselves to a much higher standard
There has to be some basis at least? Some source of confidence?
Yeah, as THE reputed source in this arena, they should hold themselves to a much higher standard
There has to be some basis at least? Some source of confidence?
To clarify -- this is the email in September PPeH edition starting with new_? The one that is unconfirmed?
Yes, but the member has now decided not to order after all due to the risk involved.
Let's be honest:
- if it's a new seller and IF they actually do sell N, you would still not know if they disguise the product sufficiently, if it makes it through customs and what the quality of the product is (IF you actually receive it).
- if it's D we STILL have the problem that he uses the same courier account which is now being watched by most customs agencies it seems and you may lose your shipment en route.
So much compounding risk in this whole scenario and 100% on the buyer's side.
Yes, but the member has now decided not to order after all due to the risk involved.
Let's be honest:
- if it's a new seller and IF they actually do sell N, you would still not know if they disguise the product sufficiently, if it makes it through customs and what the quality of the product is (IF you actually receive it).
- if it's D we STILL have the problem that he uses the same courier account which is now being watched by most customs agencies it seems and you may lose your shipment en route.
So much compounding risk in this whole scenario and 100% on the buyer's side.
So I have a user who has access to the essential PPeH. They said there was an email there yesterday. They emailed it. Told the user to pay them with Western Union. User went back and checked the PPeH today and the email was gone.
They said PPeH said "email was labelled unconfirmed"
Im confused... who has access to the PPeH to add emails to begin with? I just told them wait a few days and see if the email comes back.
Yeah, as THE reputed source in this arena, they should hold themselves to a much higher standard
There has to be some basis at least? Some source of confidence?
To clarify -- this is the email in September PPeH edition starting with new_? The one that is unconfirmed?
D's still around I reckon. There's just a lot of cloak and dagger going on. If this shortage of N is genuinely still an issue (which tbh I thought was all but over) then that's just going to further contribute to the shadow play.
D's still around I reckon. There's just a lot of cloak and dagger going on. If this shortage of N is genuinely still and issue (which tbh I thought was all but over) then that's just going to play into the shadow play.
So I have a user who has access to the essential PPeH. They said there was an email there yesterday. They emailed it. Told the user to pay them with Western Union. User went back and checked the PPeH today and the email was gone.
They said PPeH said "email was labelled unconfirmed"
Im confused... who has access to the PPeH to add emails to begin with? I just told them wait a few days and see if the email comes back.
Yes, exit publishes "the essentials" as online book. They removed the address after members in their forum asked if this new supplier had been validated for being reliable and delivering what they promise. Apparently it is not D, but the replies match previous communications with D. (Make from that what you wish)
PN from exit apparently doesn't have that reliability assurance yet (few to no confirmed transactions) so the email has been removed now.
Lots of moving parts currently.
Reactions:
damaged_soul, InjuredBrainGamer, 👁️👃👁️ and 1 other person
Yes, exit publishes "the essentials" as online book. They removed the address after members in their forum asked if this new supplier had been validated for being reliable and delivering what they promise. Apparently it is not D, but the replies match previous communications with D. (Make from that what you wish)
PN from exit apparently doesn't have that reliability assurance yet (few to no confirmed transactions) so the email has been removed now.
Yes I know.
Apparently PN himself replied to exit forum members and said he would remove the email until he is able to further validate the source.
Which of course makes sense and is in everyone's interest. But how is he planning to do this every time it changes? So many questions...
Yes I know.
Apparently PN himself replied to exit forum members and said he would remove the email until he is able to further validate the source.
Which of course makes sense and is in everyone's interest. But how is he planning to do this every time it changes? So many questions...
No I don't think you will. You might get notifications of general updates but in all honesty I don't think they do those either. If you're not on their forums you will generally just have to keep checking the publication. It does have a line of text that says when it was last updated/edited so that's of some use when checking manually.
If you're going to subscribe make sure it's the Peaceful Pill Handbook: the essentials version as they decided to disband the older full edition of the publication.
I assume it goes without saying but they will only provide access to the publication if you're 50yrs or above. If you attempt to purchase it they will take your money before vetting you and they'll huff and puff about refunding you even if they refuse access. They probably claim this is to disuade people applying without meeting requirements but it's counter productive as people generally only discover this after making payment. Can't say I know for certain but I bet many don't chase the refund up.
If you want to apply to the forum you can but they vet people and only let some in. I suspect if you tell them you're thinking of putting them in your will you'll be ushered right in lol. In all seriousness though, they do make that option available to members and non members alike. They're helpful like that.
Last edited:
Reactions:
rationaltake, betternever2havbeen, blue_muse and 2 others
Have to say I was suspicious of them. Always hard to know whether to register suspicion when so few posts have been made by the member in question. I don't want to flag someone who's potentially innocent and just seeking help.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.