• Hey Guest,

    As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. The UK and OFCOM has singled out this community and have been focusing its censorship efforts here. It takes a good amount of resources to maintain the infrastructure for our community and to resist this censorship. We would appreciate any and all donations.

    Bitcoin Address (BTC): 39deg9i6Zp1GdrwyKkqZU6rAbsEspvLBJt

    Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9

    Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVSDD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8

ijustwishtodie

ijustwishtodie

death will be my ultimate bliss
Oct 29, 2023
5,301
hi,

I don't think people have a moral obligation to kill themselves. Even if a person ending their life meant that fewer resources were taken up (debatable I think, since I think suicide actually costs the economy, and by living you may provide more resources, and also ending your life may lead to a lot of pain for others), I don't see why they have to sacrifice their whole life for this - they're not any less worthy than those they are making the sacrifice for.
Vegans aren't expecting people to sacrifice their lives for animals; they are asking that people don't sacrifice the animals' lives and allow them to suffer for the sake of sensory pleasure.

But the point that to reduce suffering entirely would mean ending all life on Earth? Honestly, I have had this thought a lot, that it would be better if no one existed, and there was no pain for anyone.
I personally have to agree with the meat eater in this case since I think that a meat eater who lives for 20 years and then kills themselves is causing less damage than a vegan who has lived for 50 years. The whole point about veganism is about suffering reduction and being dead reduces both your suffering and the suffering done upon others.

Well, yes, that's the logically extreme conclusion that we arrive to with regards to suffering. For there to be no suffering, there has to be no life. If there is life, there will always be suffering. It definitely would be better if earth was like mars and no life existed as the would be no suffering at all
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted member 8119
wildflowers1996

wildflowers1996

Mage
Oct 14, 2023
555
I personally have to agree with the meat eater in this case since I think that a meat eater who lives for 20 years and then kills themselves is causing less damage than a vegan who has lived for 50 years. The whole point about veganism is about suffering reduction and being dead reduces both your suffering and the suffering done upon others.

Well, yes, that's the logically extreme conclusion that we arrive to with regards to suffering. For there to be no suffering, there has to be no life. If there is life, there will always be suffering. It definitely would be better if earth was like mars and no life existed as the would be no suffering at all
I'm not sure the meat eater is causing less damage though? There's many other factors to consider -a person's presence on Earth may actually *reduce* suffering for others depending on what they do. And by ending their life, that is likely to cause suffering for others
 
O

obligatoryshackles

I don't want to get used to it.
Aug 11, 2023
160
I think most arguments I see about not becoming vegan are cope and rationalization by people who can't really be bothered to be vegan even though it obviously feels morally wrong on closer examination. The fact is that it just doesn't really matter to the monkey brain inside us and it's more convenient not to be vegan in most of the world. Same reasons why people fail to boycott stuff like Homophobic Chicken ChikFilA or literal death squad owner Coca Cola. Heck, even the genocide sponsor Starbucks boycott basically completely failed. Alcohol consumption is a whole other beast too, since we literally all know it directly harms us. It just takes a lot of conscious effort and real organizational power to make that kind of behavioral change on a large scale. Our brains aren't programmed to care that much or put that much effort into things like that without a major internal paradigm shift or enormous social pressure.

So in that sense, it's good to advocate for it if you truly care about it. People won't change without stimulus, after all. But I think you need a much more compelling argument than "animals are hurt and killed" to really get people to so drastically change the way they live, including me.


But here's my cope and pseudo intellectual rant anyway: I just don't think I can genuinely say that I care enough about animal suffering. You could force me to have to personally slaughter every animal I eat from now on and I would still eat meat, though less since it'd be a pain in the ass.

Like, I just straight up don't think animal suffering matters. The experience of suffering is, fundamentally, just a mechanism that tells a creature to get away from the situation it's currently in somehow. It's just a complex survival mechanism (there's some commentary here about how this also applies to humans, but that's too much of a tangent and I don't want really deal with that unless it seems important to address to someone reading this). That this behavior in animals activates our empathy when we see it is just a byproduct of our ability to empathize with each other for social cohesion. So I see no moral obligation to care about animal suffering.

Fundamentally, I think it's a silly notion that we should care about animal suffering. I mean heck, we barely care about human suffering. Moral veganism just screams virtue signaling to me. Someone deliberately being cruel to animals for no reason is obviously still a good indicator that they're probably not a very empathetic person and likely to do bad things to people too. Doesn't mean the suffering of that animal really matters on its own. And of course I still care about the well being of my pets or any animals I'm emotionally attached to. Doesn't mean I believe they should have rights.


Environmental veganism is another matter, I suppose. It's true that meat production in most developed countries is essentially an incredibly wasteful luxury industry. We might be omnivores, but we don't fundamentally need to eat meat to survive or thrive like cats or dogs (looking at you, vegans who kill their animal trying to force an unnatural diet on them). And it's indisputable that every pound of meat is drastically more costly to produce than every pound of plant matter. It's a different story if the meat is raised from pastoral grazing, converting unused land into food, but that's not what industrial scale cattle raising does. And it's not like we can't make good food without animal products,

But the fact is, environmental responsibility and sustainability wouldn't require a complete abandonment of meat, milk, and eggs to begin with. I agree that the meat industry should be a lot more ethical, but that's a far cry from wanting to stop all animal product consumption. And if it's the environment that concerns me, I can't say it's very compelling to my psyche, even though it matters to me intellectually. I mean, I don't particularly mind my personal water, electricity, or gas consumption either, so why would I bother with my animal product consumption, which has similarly miniscule impact?

Basically, why would I bother making my own life significantly worse to make no real impact while massive corporations delete entire lakes and forests for profit? Give me a dozen, a hundred, or any arbitrarily large number of people that I can realistically influence, make it my job to convince them to be more mindful of their consumption, and I'll earnestly do my best. Point me to a well organized and actually impactful protest and I'll happily go on a march or at least donate money. If you give me the means I will gladly go and personally strangle every CEO in the meat industry to death until drastic reforms are made. But I'm not gonna half heartedly boycott animal products just to hand the money I was going to give to the meat industry to the profiteering from vegans industry instead.
 
Last edited:
J

Jack_Nimble

Member
Jun 22, 2024
68
While it's challenging for OP to understand why others wouldn't be vegan it's equally challenging for most to understand why would one want to be vegan? For two big reasons. For one, animals eating animals is nature. Two, for health. There's nutrients we get from meat we just don't get from plant sources. Many of which impact mental health. Such as creatine and omega 3's in the form of EPA and DHA.
 
BojackHorseman

BojackHorseman

The View From Halfway Down
Feb 8, 2023
146
Vegetarian, but not vegan. Only vegetarian the past couple years due to cost and availability. Not vegan, again due to cost and availability. Also because as a farm kid I know that milk and cheese and eggs and wool can be humanely raised. I know that just because it CAN be done humanely, doesn't mean it always is though. I raise chickens myself for eggs, who free range happily in my yard, just so I know my eggs come from humanely raised and happy hens.
By all means, if you can reccomend cheap and simple vegab meals that can be bought at Walmart I would be thrilled to know. Not recipes though, I'm not a good cook, nor do I have the time or money for fresh ingredients. I'm talking about suggestions like Nongshim Veggie Ramen. Things I can quickly throw in the microwave.
 

Similar threads

N
Replies
2
Views
172
Suicide Discussion
notreallybored
N
shiny_quill
Replies
2
Views
312
Suicide Discussion
F@#$
F
N
Replies
4
Views
87
Offtopic
Forever Sleep
F
ambivalent_thespian
Replies
0
Views
74
Suicide Discussion
ambivalent_thespian
ambivalent_thespian
U
Replies
4
Views
278
Suicide Discussion
i-d-k
I