I'm glad your here still with us, and hopefully the questions have not been mentally taxing. I had a feeling the families would shoot you as the messenger (instead of the message) as a form of finding a sacrificial lamb to burn at the stake in a rush for judgement when anything bad happens.
Wow thanks for answering all these questions, very interesting indeed. I feel like this is actually information that would help the public in creating a more honest discussion about death.
This is an excellent and important point! And having a mortician (maybe a suicidal coroner lurking peer weigh in, if any willing. Maybe the ... Most so afraid of death but take comfort in the Goden Years of old age retirement, the absurdity of it, as Schopenhauer best put it summarily improvising from vuage memory on his Death masterstroke:
While death may take away the good things, it also takes away the desire for them, extinguishsing the flame of sentient deprivations and urges insatiable of the human condition.
The supreme evil is not death but old age, which rapidly overtakes us ever closer without warning, in the mounting of the debts of regrets we experience in hindsight, and in depreciation of all of the pleasures of life in hindsight, leaving us only with the appetite for them, and bringing with it all it sufferings. And yet, how absurd that we fear death and desire old age.
One could only imagine the insane amount of underpaid, unnoticed, unaccounted for, and underappreciated hours and energy you spend on certain (if not most) cases going above and beyond in the embalmment - only to become a wrongful target lamb for as sacrificial scapegoat over a family affairs/religeous/other conflict, butchering the messenger, not the message is appears. Others may never know how much work you've done beyond the minimum nesessary, let alone recall your name as involved in the lionshare of the post-mortem process. Is it so, and how do you manage? Do you get thank you cards, or look forward to the day you receive them deservingly, in the absence of any expectation for one? I hope you've gotten at least a few.
On the topic of Body Brokers, these for-profit NGOs that advertise terminal patients "Donate Your Body to Science" to Advance Medical Research with you election do donate your corpse an "Anotomical Gift" upon death in exchange for the company offering free-cost covered cremation with the planting of a tree and antics of the life.
Any oppinions or qualms? I could imagine a ballistic test blasted body embalment request seems like a nightmare.
For the few who know, body brokers are legal NGO or quasi-commercial companies profiting form the sale of body parts, operating under the auspices and guise that the terminal can donate their body for science and in exchange for Free of Cost cremated at no cost with the Planting of a Tree" effect cherry on top to appeal to all falacies for your signature (no guarantee next of kin will get the decedent's ashes in whole, as there's little regulatory oversight).
These companies like ScienceCares.com target the terminal to donate their body for since, to support "research in Alzhimers" and other deceptive claims of advancing medical science, and many sign away without reading the grimsly fine-print.
The truth (after reading the very small fine print myself, corroborated by an expose) is that most of their business comes from the DoD, car crash testing, and obscure end-users as human cadavers for ballistics armor penetration testing, often blown to smitheries in simulated explosions and decimated in tactical vehicle blasts to measure the strength of armor materials science resiliance, effects on certain testing of weapons and various body armor shootouts for engineering data on exhaustion testing in the misrepresentation of what these pre-mortem subjects thought they were signing up for.
Some families have sought to confirm evidence on how their son or daughter were used as dead human crash test vehicle subjects since the human data is better than the plastic crash test dummy data. These raise both ration and moral questions on the proper disposition and profiting of the dead, anticipatory full disclosure, right of election on mode of disposition, informed consent and Right of Access to information to know how loved one's corpses were used, and if used as advertised for research "antonomical gifts," or as commercial or defense industry purposes. And even
Although it could be understood from the other side's position (grieving family), their altered mental status will snap at any and all in such times. I'm sorry you have to be the wrong target of abuse, but I hope the public becomes aware of the behind-the-scenes effort that goes into such beneficent work that lacks the altruistic recognition and appreciation it deserves. I would not doubt you've gone above and beyond the standard of care, with pro bono effort, only to be dismissed as another end-of-life "problem" to deal with by the family, unbeknown that your discretion could have very well to be a dead and cold as stone in caring for ex parte affairs, beyond compliance with best practices in respecting and handing of the individual corpse in your own due professional judgement.
It seems like most people just don't understand you and the value of your role, maybe only few. The great lengths and often triple time (anatomical body brokers, hell) in the respecting but great effort to embalming complex cases, but you still do as one would want their own (or other's) in kind, which is not always possible in perfect conformity with the family wishes.
Hoping you find your peace in life or death.