Purity of N from D in May From Lab. D rocks!!

[Tortured Existence]

I finally received the results of the purity test of the sample of N from D purchased in May that was sent to the lab in Spain (It took a week for them to post). 75mg/ml!!!

I had posted the actual document from EC with identifiers redacted, but the comment from @locked*n*loaded made me paranoid, so I'm thankful that I could edit this post and delete the official document hours after it was first posted!

It's been vouched for by the commenters below. I could still print it out and redact it properly, but there's no need.

 

[The_Flying_Fox]

I had the same result (76 mg/ml, to be precise) in March this year. His N can really be trusted.

 

[Sk3le]

How this lab work? And how did u sent nembutal to them?

 

[picklemick]

Jealous

 

[Advisor321]

Ahhh, I'm so jealous!
Can't get N now, but I hope I will obtain it one day

 

[Smart No More]

Thanks for sharing this @1TorturtedByLife

Really useful to see. Some prefer not to share info like this (which I understand) but as it's so few and far between it's really helpful.
It would actually indicate that there's the full recommended 15g in 200ml which is ideal. It's funny though because if a medicine made for human consumption was higher than its labelled dosage it would be recalled at the very least. Not that I'm moaning in this instance of course.


I will say, if even though you crossed out your sample ID number its still relatively legible. If the powers that be did want to use it to trace it they potentially could. I don't necessarily think they would go to those lengths due to international challenges that would make it a large task but still, if your preference is that its fully crossed out I reckon a couple more lines would be beneficial on that front. Reckon I could guess that number in 3 or 4 attempts. Maybe lol.

 

[hankbank3928]

Thanks for sharing!

 

[FuneralCry]

I can imagine that it must be such a relief having the option of N. I hope that in whatever happens you find relief from your suffering, and thank you for sharing.

 

[Tortured Existence]

Thanks for sharing this @1TorturtedByLife

Really useful to see. Some prefer not to share info like this (which I understand) but as it's so few and far between it's really helpful.
It would actually indicate that there's the full recommended 15g in 200ml which is ideal. It's funny though because if a medicine made for human consumption was higher than its labelled dosage it eould be recalled at the very least. Not that I'm moaning in this instancreof course.


I will say, if even though you crossed out your sample ID no its still relatively legible. If the powers that be did want to use it to trace it they potentially could. I don't necessarily think they would go to those lengths due to international challenges that would make it a large task but still, if you're preference is that its fully crossed out I reckon a couple more lines would be beneficial on that feont. Reckon I could guess that number in 3 or 4 attempts. Maybe lol.

Is it better now? I have horrible eyes and don't know how to neatly block things out on my phone! I appreciate you letting me know, especially while I could still do an edit!

 

[Smart No More]

Is it better now? I have horrible eyes and don't know how to neatly block things out on my phone! I appreciate you letting me know, especially while I could still do an edit!

Yeah much better.


If you look on your picture editing app you should see an icon that indicates shapes. Like square, circle, star. If you pick that you can usually just place a rectangle over whatever you want to block out and choose a colour. Your way has done the job perfectly well though. :)

 

[Tortured Existence]

How this lab work? And how did u sent nembutal to them?

It's in the PPeH.

 

[locked*n*loaded]

I will say, if even though you crossed out your sample ID number its still relatively legible. If the powers that be did want to use it to trace it they potentially could. I don't necessarily think they would go to those lengths due to international challenges that would make it a large task but still, if your preference is that its fully crossed out I reckon a couple more lines would be beneficial on that front. Reckon I could guess that number in 3 or 4 attempts. Maybe lol.

The thing about this is if you redact something using electronic means (computer, cellphone, software, etc) the redaction can be removed by electronic means, if someone were so inclined to do that. There's software out there to do just that. I wouldn't worry about it, though. The redaction is just "laying" over what you are trying to block out. It's not the same as taking a marker onto a piece of paper and covering over what you don't want seen, whereby the marker ink impregnates itself into the paper.

 

[Smart No More]

The thing about this is if you redact something using electronic means (computer, cellphone, software, etc) the redaction can be removed by electronic means, if someone were so inclined to do that. There's software out there to do just that. I wouldn't worry about it, though. The redaction is just "laying" over what you are trying to block out. It's not the same as taking a marker onto a piece of paper and covering over what you don't want seen, whereby the marker ink impregnates itself into the paper.

That's true of some apps sure. Photoshops would allow this but it really depends on how you do it. File type etc. If it's done in 'layers' sure, it's easy to uncover but if you're overwriting an original image it isn't possible There's no reversing the changing of pixels once the file is saved/overwritten. The apps that attempt to fill images are using an algorithm that analyses the surrounding pixels and fills in the gaps based on that. It guesses. It would never know what was there originally.

Think of all those redactions in legal and government files. If they were reversible the redactions would be all but useless.

 

[Lost Magic]

Good to know that the two bottles I have from the majestic D are legit then. Thanks for doing this important research.

 

[Sk3le]

x 100 ML that's 7.5 grams of N per bottle. 2 bottles = 15 grams N .

so the total stuff to swallow with the N method is "only" 200ml in one go?

 

[pthnrdnojvsc]

so the total stuff to swallow with the N method is "only" 200ml in one go?

One bottle is 100 ML . So 2 bottles would be 200ML. i would swallow 2 bottles in one go really fast but carefully, if i were to do this. The 2 bottles for me which is 200 Ml which seems to be 15 grams according to the test. Although i would take a few ml to test before to make sure a few ml knocks me out . According to the test 1 bottle would be 7.5 grams and that might be enough but i just want to make sure i die.

 

[Smart No More]

x 100 ML that's 7.5 grams of N per bottle. 2 bottles = 15 grams N .

Yeah, ideal isn't it!? Officially they only contain 6.3g per bottle (so 12.6g total for 2 bottles) but with that number it's much nearer to the 15g dose used by euthanasia organisations. Still, the 12.6g is sufficient and there's no guarantee all bottles are as over dosed as this but seeing as there's two examples of this happening it's entirely possible they're all slightly over their labelled dose. It's also possible that EC don't have exact figures or the samples sent weren't from thoroughly shaken/mix solutions. A suspended solution that sits for some time often settles and has hot spots until shaken. All liquid meds require shaking before use. I'm purely playing devils advocate for the sake of being objective though. One things appears certain. D's vetinary N is entirely suitable for our needs.

 

[pthnrdnojvsc]

Yeah, ideal isn't it!? Officially they only contain 6.3g per bottle (so 12.6g total for 2 bottles) but with that number it's much nearer to the 15g dose used by euthanasia organisations. Still, the 12.6g is sufficient and there's no guarantee all bottles are as over dosed as this but seeing as there's two examples of this happening it's entirely possible they're all slightly over their labelled dose. It's also possible that EC don't have exact figures or the samples sent weren't from thoroughly shaken/mix solutions. A suspended solution that sits for some time often settles and has hot spots until shaken. All liquid meds require shaking before use. I'm purely playing devils advocate for the sake of being objective though. One things appears certain. D's vetinary N is entirely suitable for our needs.

Yeah it shows me EC is legit too. I mean they are not just regurgitating the 6.3 g per bottle official number. They give 2 numbers here 75 Mg and 76 MG not 63 MG per ML which is more likely to happen as you state in your scenario of it settling and not being shaken prior to taking a sample out

 

[Z-bar]

This is very encouraging even though D'S credibility speaks for itself. This just has to be my method. So peaceful.
One day…

 

[Tortured Existence]

The thing about this is if you redact something using electronic means (computer, cellphone, software, etc) the redaction can be removed by electronic means, if someone were so inclined to do that. There's software out there to do just that. I wouldn't worry about it, though. The redaction is just "laying" over what you are trying to block out. It's not the same as taking a marker onto a piece of paper and covering over what you don't want seen, whereby the marker ink impregnates itself into the paper.

Thank you. I deleted it.

 

[locked*n*loaded]

Yeah, ideal isn't it!? Officially they only contain 6.3g per bottle (so 12.6g total for 2 bottles) but with that number it's much nearer to the 15g dose used by euthanasia organisations. Still, the 12.6g is sufficient and there's no guarantee all bottles are as over dosed as this but seeing as there's two examples of this happening it's entirely possible they're all slightly over their labelled dose. It's also possible that EC don't have exact figures or the samples sent weren't from thoroughly shaken/mix solutions. A suspended solution that sits for some time often settles and has hot spots until shaken. All liquid meds require shaking before use. I'm purely playing devils advocate for the sake of being objective though. One things appears certain. D's vetinary N is entirely suitable for our needs.

Isn't it special that the manufacturer of the N is so nice as to make sure that the produced N has a higher concentration than stated to make sure the euthanized animals don't have to suffer. Sort of ironic, isn't it, that people don't get the same consideration.

 

[whitefeather]

Thankyou all so very much for these details on N from D 2022.

 

[whitefeather]

Ditto

 

[Throwawaysoul]

Shame he deleted his email and the packs are getting intercepted.