Kansas State Legislature Testimony About SS

[dweams]

Found this and thought it was funny how they completely glossed over some things like:

Users can suggest explicit methods to other anonymous users with impunity. In fact,
moderators encourage this by banning those who advise others to seek treatment.

They ignored the fact that there's a recovery section.

Worst of all, registration and age verification is not required.

Neither porn nor gore sites require registration or age verification. By age verification, I mean you don't have to show your government ID.

Lastly, it's worth mentioning that the founders of the site also run the most successful Incel
forum on the web.

The original founders of SS no longer run this forum. A transgender person does. So your whole incel argument goes completely out the window.

Here's a link to the testimony: https://www.kslegislature.gov/li_20...e_h_jud_1/documents/testimony/20240208_15.pdf

 

[EvisceratedJester]

For those wondering, the testimony is by our good friend Tantacrul, whose real name is Martin Keary.

I wish he would leave this place alone.

 

[slowdance]

For those wondering, the testimony is by our good friend Tantacrul, whose real name is Martin Keary.

I wish he would leave this place alone.

Isn't he the one who spiked the membership here because he couldn't keep his big mouth shut?

 

[EvisceratedJester]

Isn't he the one who spiked the membership here because he couldn't keep his big mouth shut?

Yup, that's him.

 

[slowdance]

Yup, that's him.

You can tell these people don't give an eff about "saving the children" and just get off on cruelty because they'd be a lot more careful about info hazard if they weren't purposefully trying to expose this place to as many people as possible. I think most people found this site through a "will someone think about the poor children " info hazard post. I know I did.

 

[EvisceratedJester]

You can tell these people don't give an eff about "saving the children" and just get off on cruelty because they'd be a lot more careful about info hazard if they weren't purposefully trying to expose this place to as many people as possible. I think most people found this site through a "will someone think about the poor children " info hazard post. I know I did.

I can only imagine the amount of minors in particular who likely found out about this site because of him. He didn't do much to ensure that minors wouldn't be able to watch his video and it's not like he did a good job at even hiding this site. It took me only a few minutes to find out what the name of this place was after watching his video so I'd imagine that it probably wouldn't be too hard for a minor to do the same.

 

[slowdance]

I can only imagine the amount of minors in particular who likely found out about this site because of him. He didn't do much to ensure that minors wouldn't be able to watch his video and it's not like he did a good job at even hiding this site. It took me only a few minutes to find out what the name of this place was after watching his video so I'd imagine that it probably wouldn't be too hard for a minor to do the same.

He purposefully tried to get the age restriction off his video so as many minors as possible could find the site. I'm sure if he had his way, the site would be the default screen of every browser in every high school in the country. That way he can have an endless supply of "incels" (vulnerable people) to kick while they're down
Actually maybe he didn't want the video age-restricted because then he couldn't make as much ad money off it

 

[EvisceratedJester]

He purposefully tried to get the age restriction off his video so as many minors as possible could find the site. I'm sure if he had his way, the site would be the default screen of every browser in every high school in the country. That way he can have an endless supply of "incels" (vulnerable people) to kick while they're down
Actually maybe he didn't want the video age-restricted because then he couldn't make as much ad money off it

Wtf! That is both incredibly irresponsible and hypocritical due to the risk of exposing the existence of this site to minors. I find it funny how he portrays himself as this morally superior figure trying to save people from all the evil SaSu users but in reality he is just punching down a bunch of vulnerable people on a suicide forum while unintentionally causing more people to flock on over here. It feels like he is just exploiting the suicide of that poor 17-year-old for his own gain.

 

[slowdance]

Wtf! That is both incredibly irresponsible and hypocritical due to the risk of exposing the existence of this site to minors. I find it funny how he portrays himself as this morally superior figure trying to save people from all the evil SaSu users but in reality he is just punching down a bunch of vulnerable people on a suicide forum while unintentionally causing more people to flock on over here. It feels like he is just exploiting the suicide of that poor 17-year-old for his own gain.

It's only hypocritical and unintentional if you believe his lies about doing it for the greater good. It's incredibly consistent with a lust for human suffering.

 

[dweams]

For those wondering, the testimony is by our good friend Tantacrul, whose real name is Martin Keary.

I wish he would leave this place alone.

I did not realize this. Omg. 0_0

 

[swankysoup]

Yeah i also ran into someone talking about the connection of sasu owners to some incel sites, i always wondered about that.