
bluem00n
Fatally killed to death
- Sep 10, 2022
- 93
Seriously, it's pathetic to troll a suicide forum in such a weird way. Grow up. It disturbs me how some people on here see the suffering of others as being a joke, like it may be amusing to you but many of us actually want to die yet struggle to leave this world, but no, who cares about that, as long as bored people are enjoying themselves on a suicide forum, as that's totally the important thing!
Yes, I find the levels of combativeness and adversarial activity being expressed here lately to be quite extraordinary, all the more so given this is supposedly a Support Forum! FuneralCry's most recent thread is just the latest of several that have fallen victim to such activity in just the last few days alone.
I've noticed too that those who frequently post adversarial remarks don't like to start threads themselves, they instead prefer to restrict their activities to criticising, undermining, and derailing threads started by others, especially targeting those towards whom they've cultivated a hostile demeanour due to differing values and points-of-view. And because of their intolerance for views that vary from their own, they won't simply walk away like other readers might - no, they'd rather stick around and start an argument. This is on a Support Forum mind!
It seems that anyone expressing a point-of-view that varies from that of a disrupter is sufficient grounds for them to inject an adversarial tone to a thread (yes, even on a Support Forum!). And their goal always seems to be to 'win the argument', rather than get to the truth of a matter. So they'll just go on and on (and on) posting what are typically brief offhand remarks requiring little thought and no substance, but nevertheless using every disruptive trick in the book, until they have in their own mind 'won the argument'.
That 'achievement' is affirmed for a disruptor when they (else a member of their group) get to have 'the last word' - the lack of a response to their latest post is a sign that the thread starter has been worn down fending off multiple attacks on their thread, and has given up, has in effect been 'vanquished' from their own thread. This is a 'bullying into submission' strategy plain and simple.
The likely outcome of such activities is that a Forum steadily degrades, to a point where it becomes just another victim of online toxicity. And the only way to avoid that depends on whether the individuals causing the damage see it in their longterm interests to refrain. Unfortunately, that seems less likely on a forum where dopamine levels are already deficient, as forfeiting the instant gratification of having 'the last word' might prove too problematic for disruptors at SS.
As I proposed on another thread that was likewise being derailed recently ...
I've noticed too that those who frequently post adversarial remarks don't like to start threads themselves, they instead prefer to restrict their activities to criticising, undermining, and derailing threads started by others, especially targeting those towards whom they've cultivated a hostile demeanour due to differing values and points-of-view. And because of their intolerance for views that vary from their own, they won't simply walk away like other readers might - no, they'd rather stick around and start an argument. This is on a Support Forum mind!
It seems that anyone expressing a point-of-view that varies from that of a disrupter is sufficient grounds for them to inject an adversarial tone to a thread (yes, even on a Support Forum!). And their goal always seems to be to 'win the argument', rather than get to the truth of a matter. So they'll just go on and on (and on) posting what are typically brief offhand remarks requiring little thought and no substance, but nevertheless using every disruptive trick in the book, until they have in their own mind 'won the argument'.
That 'achievement' is affirmed for a disruptor when they (else a member of their group) get to have 'the last word' - the lack of a response to their latest post is a sign that the thread starter has been worn down fending off multiple attacks on their thread, and has given up, has in effect been 'vanquished' from their own thread. This is a 'bullying into submission' strategy plain and simple.
The likely outcome of such activities is that a Forum steadily degrades, to a point where it becomes just another victim of online toxicity. And the only way to avoid that depends on whether the individuals causing the damage see it in their longterm interests to refrain. Unfortunately, that seems less likely on a forum where dopamine levels are already deficient, as forfeiting the instant gratification of having 'the last word' might prove too problematic for disruptors at SS.
As I proposed on another thread that was likewise being derailed recently ...
Posts that set out to undermine threads started in good faith are becoming a thing round here. Perhaps try and remember this is a Support Forum, and posts should lean towards being empathic, rather than cynical or confrontational.
So if a post can't offer support to the OP of a thread, maybe start another thread and submit alternative viewpoints there instead - adversarial posts in the original thread just come across as vexatious - creating mischief for its own sake. What's more, they're being posted despite the author knowing the OP is suicidal (that seems the most extraordinary aspect really). This is after all supposed to be a SUPPORT forum for suicidal people ...