S
Someone123
Illuminated
- Oct 19, 2021
- 3,876
The last one apparently is a psychiatrist..
This is a tough situation for the site for sure.
The last one apparently is a psychiatrist..
I verified this and this is also true on yahoo.No really earlier I could just typ sanctioned suicide in google. Now I have to typ the full adress above.
Google doesnt want this site to show anymore!
I'm not sure quite what you mean but I just searched on google by sanctioned suicide and the site did not show up- have you tried this?@Ch92921 i meant when I googled the fixers account when it was public to view as a guest.
No I haven't . I will now though,I'm not sure quite what you mean but I just searched on google by sanctioned suicide and the site did not show up- have you tried this?
Well it doesn't show up directly but it shows our twitter page the the address is there.No I haven't . I will now though,
Yes, they haven't gotten to twitter yet, but it won't be long, I would think. This link also appears in some other places but it won't be long before these are gone too, I would think. I suppose there will be something on the dark web, but that's gioing to be too much trouble for me and for alot of people- I already know what I need to know, it's just that the support and understanding have been helpful.No I haven't . I will now though,
Well it doesn't show up directly but it shows our twitter page the the address is there.
Question of time.Twitter was hardly used
No surprise there. We still here, let's see what happens.
Which is a great Depeche Mode song, not sure why that was the first thing that came into my headQuestion of time.
Funny how they describe us, a bunch of desperate individuals. Wish I could write to that editor and tell him my story.Question of time.
My mom finds new conspiracy theories everyday and she is fed by other such people who refuse to do anything about the mental health system but want to blame everyone around them.
Exactly they think they can silence us but theyre sorely wrong !!I don't even know where to start with this one. What is she talking about? Minors aren't tolerated at all. They're actually banned on sight - that's a very strict policy and we're enforcing this rule without exception. It's amazing how confidently she spreads her lies now after the NYT affirmed her willfully ignorant narrative about this forum. I wonder if she really believes this is going her way. Her posts are absurd on so many levels.
Literally nobody has encouraged members to attack grieving parents either. You won't find one single post of staff members doing that. It's also interesting how she twist the actual situation considering her entire social media presence was created to smear and slander us into oblivion. Who is attacking who exactly? Seriously though, considering her purposely misleading narrative she shouldn't be surprised if members of this community use their voice to counter her lies - voices which she ignored and walked over for the last few years by the way. I think the outrage of this community is justified considering we've been dragged through the dirt for the last ~3 years.
Here is the deal. It's not that complicated. We are consenting and autonomous adults. We have a right to discuss strongly neglected human rights such as the right to die - an issue that's been brushed under the rug for decades despite the public opinion which supports legislation to change the current situation in many countries all around the world by the way. And that's one part of the forum. Another important part of this forum is the overhelming support and compassion that struggling people experience in this community, myself included. There is a reason why people want to use this forum, it gives them a space to discuss subjects that are considered taboo out there. It's why the NYT article has led so many new members to this forum in the first place. Every time you mention that there is a place out there, in the distant corners of the internet, that allows people to talk about deeply personal struggles without censorship and the moralising undertone, a platform that recognises individual autonomy and the right to decide what happens with your own life (which you essentially treat like the forbidden fruit of the 21th century by the way) you will increase the member count of this forum - deal with it. You can't ban these ideas. And all members that engage in this community do so voluntarily. There is no encouragement, there is no hidden agenda, there is no profiting, this is about principles. And as others already pointed out in this thread, this community and the discussions related to this website deserve to exist. You're not gonna silence us, period.
This is a good thing. It's no longer being indexed by google and the forums content is no longer available to none members. It's a step forward. Goolge will always edit out sites of conteoversy for their own security reasons. They want to appear wholesome for the sake of their income. Its under the guise of morality but they'll take money where they can. Look at the mess they made od youtube which was once a platform for free speaxh and a vehicle for the layman to share anything they see fit. Now it's essentially had a 'TV' esque filter thrown over it in the form of algorithms and encouragment for highly mainstream content. It's lost its edge and any semblance of genuine identity. It no longer reflects the world in its unedited reality. Instead sugar coating it to the point of sickliness. I can feel my teeth rotting when I check the trending pages. This is the way the internet is going but it doesn't mean places like SS can't still exist in the far reaches.No really earlier I could just typ sanctioned suicide in google. Now I have to typ the full adress above.
Google doesnt want this site to show anymore!
Agreed.How is this website 'encouraging' suicide? This is just an excuse to shut down free speech. We are not the bad guys here. We are just desperate people looking for a way out.
I just hope people in need will still be able to find this site... I wonder what can we, as members, do to preserve it (it all seems unreal, like a witches hunt lol).This is a good thing. It's no longer being indexed by google and the forums content is no longer available to none members. It's a step forward. Goolge will always edit out sites of conteoversy for their own security reasons. They want to appear wholesome for the sake of their income. Its under the guise of morality but they'll take money where they can. Look at the mess they made od youtube which was once a platform for free speaxh and a vehicle for the layman to share anything they see fit. Now it's essentially had a 'TV' esque filter thrown over it in the form of algorithms and encouragment for highly mainstream content. It's lost its edge and any semblance of genuine identity. It no longer reflects the world in its unedited reality. Instead sugar coating it to the point of sickliness. I can feel my teeth rotting when I check the trending pages. This is the way the internet is going but it doesn't mean places like SS can't still exist in the far reaches.
Onion/dark net sites have clear net prescence too. There are many sites on clearnet with details on how to access dark net sites so hopefully if we went that way the site would be searchable with relative ease. Of course articles about the site bring even more attention and serve as a method of discovery. I doubt NYT feel any guilt over this as long as they're making their money. The hypocrisy of media/journalism.I just hope people in need will still be able to find this site... I wonder what can we, as members, do to preserve it (it all seems unreal, like a witches hunt lol).
the funniest thing is after the interview about how people take their own lives both reporters just smile in front of the camera thanking them for their attention
Google did take action. Google dont want toshow this site anymore! I am worried.
Google, yahoo and the like censor a lot of things; I'm surprised they didnt do this earlier. DuckDuckGo and searx still worksI verified this and this is also true on yahoo.
Some members of congress are asking the Department of Justice to prosecute the owners of SS, and also to identify websites like it and to notify local law enforcement about them. The first section is just summarizing points from the NYT article. You can get the gist of what that article said from the interview PBS did recently with the authors:I saw FT26 put 2 pictures of text i saw it mentioned NYT and forum name but is too small n lots of words for me whats it say basically ?
View attachment 817089View attachment 81710
Oh thanks i watched some of the video but from all the bullshit they were saying i couldn't really watch the rest plus the way they talk is on the dull side tooSome members of congress are asking the Department of Justice to prosecute the owners of SS, and also to identify websites like it and to notify local law enforcement about them. The first section is just summarizing points from the NYT article. You can get the gist of what that article said from the interview PBS did recently with the authors:
PBS NewsHour | Why a website with directions for suicide remains active | Season 2021 | PBS
Why a website with explicit directions for suicide remains activewww.pbs.org
(about 8 minutes long)
Of course the fucking pussies disable comments.
I don't even know where to start with this one. What is she talking about? Minors aren't tolerated at all. They're actually banned on sight - that's a very strict policy and we're enforcing this rule without exception. It's amazing how confidently she spreads her lies now after the NYT affirmed her willfully ignorant narrative about this forum. I wonder if she really believes this is going her way. Her posts are absurd on so many levels.
Literally nobody has encouraged members to attack grieving parents either. You won't find one single post of staff members doing that. It's also interesting how she twist the actual situation considering her entire social media presence was created to smear and slander us into oblivion. Who is attacking who exactly? Seriously though, considering her purposely misleading narrative she shouldn't be surprised if members of this community use their voice to counter her lies - voices which she ignored and walked over for the last few years by the way. I think the outrage of this community is justified considering we've been dragged through the dirt for the last ~3 years.
Here is the deal. It's not that complicated. We are consenting and autonomous adults. We have a right to discuss strongly neglected human rights such as the right to die - an issue that's been brushed under the rug for decades despite the public opinion which supports legislation to change the current situation in many countries all around the world by the way. And that's one part of the forum. Another important part of this forum is the overhelming support and compassion that struggling people experience in this community, myself included. There is a reason why people want to use this forum, it gives them a space to discuss subjects that are considered taboo out there. It's why the NYT article has led so many new members to this forum in the first place. Every time you mention that there is a place out there, in the distant corners of the internet, that allows people to talk about deeply personal struggles without censorship and the moralising undertone, a platform that recognises individual autonomy and the right to decide what happens with your own life (which you essentially treat like the forbidden fruit of the 21th century by the way) you will increase the member count of this forum - deal with it. You can't ban these ideas. And all members that engage in this community do so voluntarily. There is no encouragement, there is no hidden agenda, there is no profiting, this is about principles. And as others already pointed out in this thread, this community and the discussions related to this website deserve to exist. You're not gonna silence us, period.