BipolarGuy
Enlightened
- Aug 6, 2020
- 1,456
I don't see that as a valid argument.I also sympathise with them at least on a personal level but I was just sayin it seems counterproductive to what they're trying to achieve in not wanting people to use this site then giving out the URL, I mean it's like that "don't think of an elephant" analogy
If you wish to campaign against something, but won't tell people what you're actually campaigning against, this would give rise to an utterly ridiculous situation.
So the fact that they publish the URL of the website they're campaigning against is neither here nor there.