You asked me, I answered how I'd handle my own situation.
There are 2 detailed documented cases like this. 1 is with a non member. There is no need as it proves no value to anything.
They are here but only current as of May 18. The others were captured in this thread as they've happened.
And that post is from this thread
https://sanctioned-suicide.net/threads/sn-resource-page.32633/
To summarize, and to hopefully close this discussion peacefully and with mutual respect...
(Trying to state this objectively as I can, when I say "you," it's not with an accusatory tone! I'm just trying to suss this out and make it linear. I sincerely intend no offense.)
You've shared documentation of an SN success without naming the member who ctb'd, nor the member who witnessed it, nor the source of the embedded quote for reference.
It was a private experience between those two members.
It is easy to figure out who the member was who ctb'd, and s/he did not give permission to be outed, to share their final moments with the forum, or to contribute to the forum gaining more knowledge about the method. Therefore, his/her confidentiality has been breached without his/her consent.
I have opposed any of this being made public anywhere on the forum, and opposed including the information being included as part of the anecdotal accounts of SN successes, and disputed the claim that it is confirmed.
You stand by all of your all of your actions in sharing this account on another thread or on this one.
We have both publicly stated our positions and have not reached agreement. I accept that this is where it stands.
As always, I sincerely wish for your well-being, and remain true to holding no rancor against you about this, only opposition to the actions. I've stated my opposition and have no need to continue the discussion. I hope, if you see reason in this, that you will agree to also accept that we disagree, so that this valuable thread does not derail and get locked. You contribute in this particular space more than any other member, and have brought much value to the gathering and reporting of SN documentation. I am ready to leave it at that if you are.
I welcome your response to this comment should there be a need for correction in my summary, or if you do not agree to my appeal to end the disagreement where it is, with mutual acceptance and respect.