That was a terrible article, even by the low standards set previously by the failing NY Times, Australia's ABC and the ignoramus on YouTube.
The Streisand Effect
First of all, we know from experience that ignorant articles like this promote the website they are attempting to defame, and will immediately lead to a large influx of new people - maybe thousands. The 'hero' journalist will be directly responsible for far more deaths than the 50 they are supposedly grieving. This is either a deadly way for a fool to learn about the
Streisand Effect, or a deeply unethical way for a morally bankrupt journalist to achieve clicks for a sensationalist article.
If I were reading about it for the first time, I would immediately make every effort to find this place as it is clearly a rare online haven of genuine understanding for people in extreme distress. Severe quality-of-life issues can afflict anyone, and only then will they understand. The fact that unsupervised children can access all sorts of inappropriate content is a universal tragedy of circumstance, not an intended consequence of an 18+ website that justifies censorship.
Absurd Oversimplification
Secondly, the narrative of 'innocent happy person randomly stumbles across wicked pro-suicide website and is murdered by it within weeks' makes
absolutely zero effort to investigate the actual causes and serious issues that these people have been facing, the individuals who tormented them until they could no longer cope and the institutions that idly stood by throughout.
Internet Equals Information
Thirdly, information on suicide methods is readily available across the web. There's even a large Wikipedia page on the topic. So, yet another dead-end argument.
Flawed Premise
Fourthly, endless action has been taken against this website and the SN method over the years. It has been censored, blocked and banned as far as possible. Ironically, the finally remaining problem is ignorant and/or nefarious journalists promoting it via deeply flawed articles which infantalise people in extreme distress and falsely claim that blocking their access to a lifeline of understanding will magically address their issues.
Genuine Solutions? Crickets.
I dare any one of these heroes to come up with a genuine solution to the problems that are driving me to death, or those of anyone else here. They will very quickly be humbled when they realise that in many cases, there aren't any. Any reasonable person with personal experience of sustained low quality of life knows well that there's a lot more to complex discussions about suicide, euthanasia and self-determination than simply banning information and methods.