1. No hostility to it.
That said, I REALLY hate the people putting up AI generated videos on social media, especially the "This elephant saved this tiger" or "This fox came and asked me for help" crap, and pretending it happened.
But other than that, I'm not really seeing any problem with it.
Art: It's a slot machine. If you need a reliable bit of art you still need a human artist.
Music: People follow bands, artists because of that artist and they way they sound. I'm not about to throw out all my Type O Negative CDs because someone in Udio can create something interesting to listen to.
Writing: AI can't do this yet. It can produce a story that will span about 10-15k words, but more than that plot falls apart, characters start switching genders and roles, the LLM compresses earlier story beats as it recycles tokens, and the result is an absolute shitshow. There IS AI assisted writing, where someone has an idea, constructs a plot, and uses AI to do line edits or do chunks of prose, brainstorm, research etc. But the human is still the creative hand. Anyone stroppy at that should also be stroppy at word processors, spell checkers, grammarly etc.
Video: Yeah that's the one that's doing my head in. But our social media climate, the need to get attention and stuff, is as much a driving force behind that as AI. AI is simply a tool. If AI video generation didn't exist, we'd still be getting those terrible vids were people are approaching strangers on the street and asking them for dates and stuff.