Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC):
Ethereum (ETH):
Monero (XMR):
MethodGuns/firearms megathread
Thread starterTAW122
Start date
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
They only mention fragments for a few shotgun cases: can we assume the other shotgun survivors are from slugs? Also, what do you think about rifle vs slug? Similar in lethality? There is probably reasons why shotgun seems to be preferred over rifle, but it might just be convenience and access.
They only mention fragments for a few shotgun cases: can we assume the other shotgun survivors are from slugs? Also, what do you think about rifle vs slug? Similar in lethality? There is probably reasons why shotgun seems to be preferred over rifle, but it might just be convenience and access.
Yeah you are probably right considering probability, because slugs seem to be less used than both buckshot and birdshot. But contact wound from standard shotgun buckshot also has high chances of bursting the head- based on survival from variety of guns, I would not conclude any is lethal enough to succeed without proper aim, and "provide damage everywhere".
Yeah you are probably right considering probability, because slugs seem to be less used than both buckshot and birdshot. But contact wound from standard shotgun buckshot also has high chances of bursting the head- based on survival from variety of guns, I would not conclude any is lethal enough to succeed without proper aim, and "provide damage everywhere".
I agree with everything but the last statement: one of the study you showed concluded that head bursting was a consequence of kinetic energy, not impacted by type of ammunition. And I don't know if that is even the right conclusion.
I agree with everything but the last statement: one of the study you showed concluded that head bursting was a consequence of kinetic energy, not impacted by type of ammunition. And I don't know if that is even the right conclusion.
Yeah I understood the first part, I'm not sure about the second part: Buckshots inherently have less energy than slugs. This is something that ultimately depends on the specific ammunition used, usually will be shown on packaging. Definitely something to consider when choosing.
Hello, everyone. Please advise if, in my country, it is only possible to obtain hunting weapons with a special permit, whether it is worth considering purchasing a firearm illegally.
Which of these options is preferable?
Is it better to obtain a legal hunting weapon or attempt to obtain a pistol illegally? Which option is truly worth considering? Thank you.
Another day in one of the most gun-friendly places on earth, another day I'm too pussy to buy one.
I already knew it was gruesome, but seeing pics of shotgun blasts to the head made me afraid. I also saw a video of a faceless guy writhing on a hospital bed. But that's so unlikely.
LostAllHope says a shotgun blast to the head is 99% lethal with 5/100 agony. It's the #1 method for a reason. I'm looking at a click and gone.
Yes, there's half a head left and an explosion of blood and brains. But it does not hurt. It might as well be Nembutal. You barely need to make the decision. You put some weight on the trigger and you're gone. You wouldn't even hear it!
I CANNOT GET A PAINLESS DRUG. I need to get that through my head. Fantasizing about it won't make it happen. Action, that is, going to the damn pawn shop or sporting goods store or texting a private seller makes it happen. The way to end my pain is a shotgun. I must put one foot in front of the other.
Reactions:
isthisthingon, bruised_reed, BlooBerryBanjo3000 and 3 others
to maximize chance of death, would it be smart to mix two potential methods? Like a bullet through the mouth and OD? Like timing it so you take the drugs and then shoot so you can maximize lethality
I have a shotgun and have tried several time to go through with it but it's really hard to press the final trigger pull with it up to your head. I was also thinking I might set up some sort of wrapping to contain the brain matter, or go in the closet but I'm not sure. Another thing with a long Mossberg shotgun its hard to angle it right and keep it there even if you have long arms like me. Maybe I will draw a circle there with a marker and use a mirror to help me ensure the best possible shot. I have truball federal reserve deep penetrators and also double 00 buckshot. Not sure which will cause death faster or how the mess would differentiate.
I've looked through the thread (admittedly, I didn't read every comment) and still have a couple of questions. I'm most likely using a 9mm through the mouth. what grain should I use? Would 115gr be enough or should I go with 147gr? I'm trying to take over penetration into consideration. I'll be in shed with a single wall as a backstop. Which brings me to my next question. Should I add additional layers of plywood as a security for the backstop...how much?
Should I use flanged vs simple hollow points if I can get them?
My initial thought is that 115gr hollow points should be enough to penetrate into the brainstem.
Aim for the pink circle? Can anyone explain why this is the preferred area on this forum? It seems completely made up by one user without any data to back it up. It gets reused and reused through out the megathread.
About 42% of gunshot-to-the-head victims who reach the hospital survive. Survival depends on bullet location, velocity, caliber, and how quickly medical aid arrives. Here's the science behind it.
It's a .357 magnum for me too. I have both 158 grain soft points and 125 grain jacketed hollow points. I'm leaning toward using the hollow points, but they both have their advantages. I'm not a gun person (unfortunately) and I haven't seen the firepower of either in the wild. And it will probably be through the mouth for me. Mind if I ask why you're choosing the side of the head? I'm going through the mouth because it feels steadier to grip the gun with both hands.
That chart on Lost All Hope... I keep wondering how they got their numbers. The time to die after a shot gun to the head should be milliseconds, unless someone with really bad aim skewed the average. But whatever, our odds are very good.
to maximize chance of death, would it be smart to mix two potential methods? Like a bullet through the mouth and OD? Like timing it so you take the drugs and then shoot so you can maximize lethality
A large dose of aspirin 30 minutes before to maximize bleeding. It's not as effective as a massive dose of heroin or what have you, but it's easy, available, and won't impair my aim.
That chart on Lost All Hope... I keep wondering how they got their numbers. The time to die after a shot gun to the head should be milliseconds, unless someone with really bad aim skewed the average. But whatever, our odds are very good.
I'm sure I'll chime in more as the thread progresses, and generally make my usual verbose nuisance of myself, but I'll start with this:
Hollywood representations of gun suicides are a very, very bad template to follow. Shooting yourself in the temple, or holding the gun under your chin, is a BAD idea, for either pistol or long-gun attempts. The odds are good you won't hit the all-important brainstem, but will instead blow out your frontal lobe and end up a vegetable. Some people have even blown off the entire front of their face and lived --and been able to survive without a life support machine. If you think your life is bad now...
These Hollywood aimpoints are probably the majority of why gun suicide statistics show only an 82.5% success rate rather than 100%.
I'll collect a few more thoughts and be back later.
Side of the head with a handgun is statistically the most lethal path anyway with handguns, I've debunked the brain stem obsession on this forum too many times, you can find them if you look around. More info on here though I should update it I've also engaged with so many users here on temple vs in the mouth and have provided empirical evidence supporting my claims.
i dont have one currently but i was thinking of getting a shotgun as i heard its most lethal. i would really prefer not to do the mouth method i know im gonna mess that one up.
i dont have one currently but i was thinking of getting a shotgun as i heard its most lethal. i would really prefer not to do the mouth method i know im gonna mess that one up.
Firearms are 90% lethal. This data includes all firearm attempts over a certain period in the US. With a shotgun that number only increases. The majority of the lethal shots in another study are through the mouth or to the side of the head center mass.
In your research regarding handguns, is it right above the ear or slightly behind the ear? From what I've gathered it really doesn't matter both will be lethal. Do you agree with that?
I like to hear from people who have put the research in.
In your research regarding handguns, is it right above the ear or slightly behind the ear? From what I've gathered it really doesn't matter both will be lethal. Do you agree with that?
Side of the head with a handgun is statistically the most lethal path anyway with handguns, I've debunked the brain stem obsession on this forum too many times, you can find them if you look around. More info on here though I should update it I've also engaged with so many users here on temple vs in the mouth and have provided empirical evidence supporting my claims.
I haven't read anything from you on here, that debunks 12 GA in the mouth aimed at the brainstem as being the most lethal method with a firearm and the fastest way to render yourself unconscious.
(Which is the goal of any method, to achieve unconsciousness as quickly as possible)
Brainstem is instant if done correctly.
Other areas such as heart etc, are not an instant death and you've got the rib cage to factor in which can potentially take some of the heat out of the shot. (Likely not enough to survive if it's a contact shot with 00 buck etc, but still enough that it will hurt like hell)
I haven't read anything from you on here, that debunks 12 GA in the mouth aimed at the brainstem as being the most lethal method with a firearm and the fastest way to render yourself unconscious.
(Which is the goal of any method, to achieve unconsciousness as quickly as possible)
Brainstem is instant if done correctly.
Other areas such as heart etc, are not an instant death and you've got the rib cage to factor in which can potentially take some of the heat out of the shot. (Likely not enough to survive if it's a contact shot with 00 buck etc, but still enough that it will hurt like hell)
I didn't say anything regarding shotguns in fact I've said in threads that it would be one of the most lethal ways, I was talking about HANDGUNS because handgun positions are the most debated on this forum, everyone knows that a shotgun in the mouth results in death 99% of the time. The variables that make a shotgun shot in the mouth successful are different than the ones that make a handgun shot in the mouth successful because they shoot two completely different types of projectiles.
Reactions:
CatLvr, isthisthingon and Isolatedloner
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.