4
406metallicblue
Student
- Sep 7, 2018
- 180
I'd say sticking one's hand into a small gap in the tent for a few seconds isn't going to significantly diminish the co. I don't know how long a 10000ppm meter takes to make the reading though.
How much research have you done about the generator method?So I went and bought a generator, filled it up and was just about to turn it on when I discovered the on/off switch had broken. FML
A little bit. I was going to turn it on in my car and monitor how much CO was produced using a CO alarm. From what I've heard it's quite an effective method, just a bit more costly than charcoalHow much research have you done about the generator method?
not a very peaceful way to go. Still, you can't have everything.
I wonder How this would turn out?
100mg of amitriptyline + a bottle of wine for the unconsciousness/deep sleep and a perfectly warmed-up load of charcoal(mostly white) in a taped room.
For real?"Powdered zinc can be mixed with calcium carbonate and heated to produce carbon monoxide." (PPeH)
This could be interesting for some of us, because some of us will find it alot easier to get those ingredients then sulfuric acid and this should be significantly more predictable then charcoal. This can simply be done with a hotplate on a timer in your bathroom.
Looks legit: https://www.jjstech.com/carbonmonoxide2.htmlFor real?
In the laboratory
Carbon monoxide is conveniently produced in the lab by the dehydration of formic acid, for example with sulfuric acid. Another method is heating an intimate mixture of powdered zinc metal and calcium carbonate, which releases CO by the reaction
- Zn + CaCO3 → ZnO + CaO
For what chemical reasons, can you give details please.Alcohol is not good for this CO method. (this has chemical reasons)
For what chemical reasons, can you give details please.
Your english is fine. I think moderate alcohol consumption is best anyway, if you get blasted you're more likely to make mistakes. Half a bottle of wine and a few benzos would be my preference. You can go into outrageous detail about all this, like if it's more effective on an empty stomach or not. But you make a good point.Alcohol should only be used moderately with this method because it dilates the finest blood vessels and could possibly counteract hemoglobin blockade of carbon monoxide.
There should be also medical studies about that topic. My english is not so good, so maybe you can google that topic, if you want more details about that.
Your english is fine. I think moderate alcohol consumption is best anyway, if you get blasted you're more likely to make mistakes. Half a bottle of wine and a few benzos would be my preference. You can go into outrageous detail about all this, like if it's more effective on an empty stomach or not. But you make a good point.
A third method is using a petrol generator to create CO.@Spiko ,
Reading about that detector that can go up to 10,000 PPM turned my attention to this thread. Being able to get a very high PPM for long enough is critical for a humane, quick and reliable death.
As for the method of obtaining CO and filling a room with a high enough concentration: I recall two methods, one being the sulphuric acid plus formic acid and the other one charcoal brics or a version of that.
I'm in Europe and what's available here may be different compared to the USA.
Is anything in particular recommended to obtain a very high PPM reading safely and effectively ? ... I wasn't planning on buying a small car, or putting up a tent in my house ...
Your english is fine. I think moderate alcohol consumption is best anyway, if you get blasted you're more likely to make mistakes. Half a bottle of wine and a few benzos would be my preference. You can go into outrageous detail about all this, like if it's more effective on an empty stomach or not. But you make a good point.
A third method is using a petrol generator to create CO.
I have no idea, perhaps like all things in moderation. A sandwich, a few glasses of wine and a handful of benzos after letting the coals get ready. I'll see if i can find something about whether chocolate inhibits the uptake of CO into the system..... (i'm kidding).Is it more effective on an empty stomach though?
They can be pretty heavy things. In a small space like a tent a 1000w genny i think would be enough and would weigh about 20 kilos. A generator in a shared appartment is a non starter as you say. A generator would i think be feasable in a tent. My objective in using a generator is to make it look like an accident, in a house i am renovating. If i didn't need to make it look like an accident i would probably go with charcoal in a vehicle or a tent, just because generators are very noisy, about 90 decibels and charcoal is silent, so would be more peaceful.Yes. This is (in my opinion), the best method for creating CO. But i live with my mother in an apartment , so i can't do this petrol generator method in the apartment.
I have bought a tent. But i don't know, if the petrol generator would work in a tent. And the other problem is, that i have no car, so i would must transport this petrol generator via bus, and maybe the people would become suspicious about that.
So, it's probably better, with the charcoal method, because this is not so suspicious.
This is so frustrating. First off I have no Health Insurance so if I get caught before the bus leaves and taken to a hospital I am scr*wed with bills after a LONG mandatory mental. Second off I have a garage but everyone keeps saying that a car's exhaust won't work any more.(Which I find hard to believe because I just read a news article about a wife and her lover that died having sex in a car running in a garage.)I have no idea, perhaps like all things in moderation. A sandwich, a few glasses of wine and a handful of benzos after letting the coals get ready. I'll see if i can find something about whether chocolate inhibits the uptake of CO into the system..... (i'm kidding).
They can be pretty heavy things. In a small space like a tent a 1000w genny i think would be enough and would weigh about 20 kilos. A generator in a shared appartment is a non starter as you say. A generator would i think be feasable in a tent. My objective in using a generator is to make it look like an accident, in a house i am renovating. If i didn't need to make it look like an accident i would probably go with charcoal in a vehicle or a tent, just because generators are very noisy, about 90 decibels and charcoal is silent, so would be more peaceful.
The advantage with a generator is that there is no complicated set up, you just fire it up. I'd rather not ctb with 90 decibels in my ears and would prefer some music but then you can't have it all.
I have no idea, perhaps like all things in moderation. A sandwich, a few glasses of wine and a handful of benzos after letting the coals get ready. I'll see if i can find something about whether chocolate inhibits the uptake of CO into the system..... (i'm kidding).
So apparently the grip of chimney starters can melt and the entire thing gets pretty dangerous. Jeez, would be ridiculous to forget your gloves.
Lump charcoals or briquettes???
I tend to the latter as they burn longer and don't emit any smoke. But they do contain lots of additives.
I was looking into formic/sulfuric acid, it seems like a nice way to go as long if it tests properly. Though from what I hear, N is the best although a bit expensive. I've seen some people saying there were issues with this method, but it seems as long as the reaction is continuing there should be no issues with a proper flask, right? I've thought about buying 2 and using them together just in case one messes up somehow.
There really shouldn't be any issues with this method as long as I purify everything with water to avoid burning since the whole point is to avoid pain if possible.
This method is a terrible idea. Ever wondered why most people don't use it, when it's supposedly better than charcoal ? The answer is, because it is not better than charcoal . Sulphuric acid is highly corrosive and poisonous (along with its fumes!). Breathing its fumes in, in a small enclosed space, will be so uncomfortable / painful , that you will quickly cancel the attempt . They use sulphuric acid to melt people's faces in attacks . Now you get the idea?
The charcoal doesn't form a solid lump and so i would say that yes, the gas comes from the bottom although inevitably they will gas more slowly than the top ones.A question, to the following picture:
If i burn charcoals and then put the charcoals it in a steel bucket, does the gases from the BOTTOM of the steel bucket come also UP to in the air? (because the other charcoals are OVER them? )
The chimney starter i used had a metal shield to protect the handle, it got pretty hot but i was careful and it didn't pose a problem. The binders used in briquettes vary according to the manufacturer, they ought to be written on the bag as to whether they are 'natural' or not.So apparently the grip of chimney starters can melt and the entire thing gets pretty dangerous. Jeez, would be ridiculous to forget your gloves.
Lump charcoals or briquettes???
I tend to the latter as they burn longer and don't emit any smoke. But they do contain lots of additives.
The purpose of waiting for buildup is usually to avoid that nausea and fall asleep quick. The only thing that should cause panic or wake you up is Carbon Dioxide. It triggers a reflex in your body that tells you you're being suffocated.