Amitriptyline reliability

[thedarkdog]

I tried and failed with that method 2 years ago.
It was 10gm of Ami + anti emetics and Benzos.
I have no lasting damage from the pills themselves but nerve damage in my right pinky finger from lying on my hand for 4 days. I did not vomit and wasn't found for a whole 4 days.

 

[intr0verse]

@intr0verse
I don't mean to oppose taking 15g or more, however I still believe this would not help to shorten the process. To begin with if there is a wiggle room to increase the dose on speculation, it means that this method is far from backed up with the sufficient number of researches and precedents. We've already exhausted credible sources about amitriptyline CTB. None of them suggest to take more than 10g to die more quickly. I think that PPH changes reflected this uncertain nature of the method getting clear. If the individual failures of amitriptyline attempts have mainly come from a lack of mature plans, PPH didn't need to be revised. Frankly I think that to pursue the option with low or moderate reliability at a quite large effort is not to make a careful plan.

I wish i had more to add to this discussion, but for the moment, i don't, unfortunatey.
In summary, i think that amitriptyline is a viable option provided 15g (or more) are used, ensure no early discovery and medical intervention occurs for 72 hours (to be on the safe side), combine it with a long-acting benzodiazepine (diazepam, 600mg) to make it more peaceful and a short-acting benzodiazepine to fall asleep more quickly, and of course an anti-emetic.

I appreciate that this discussion is giving me insight into amitriptyline but I'm not feeling comfortable to portray this medication as a viable CTB method especially to those who recently join us and prefer OD.

We're not here to teach them anything! It should be their job to read as much as they can about a specific method and decide in accordance.