The natural world is fundamentally irredeemable and vile. The more species that go extinct; the better. Omnicide isn't something to rue or lament having happened. Quite the contrary, it's the best thing that could have ever happened. The DNA of any living creature is half brutal taskmaster and half rasping parasite. It has programmed both in us, and in all the creatures that have ever existed, the insidious need to condemn generation after generation to near constant suffering and eventual death. Nothing is achieved or gained by doing this. Evolution is a directionless process that produces nothing, but what it can get away with making in the first place. Anything that can be thrown at the wall; will be. Even if it leads to certain species fatally succumbing to the very nature they were bred to follow (e.g. Fisherian runaway), or species that inflict profound levels of agony merely as a product of their very biology (e.g. tarantula hawks). Either way, most species, on average, exist only somewhere between 5-10 million years. After that, they tend to go extinct. For mammals, it's usually just a million years.
All that pain, all that spent energy, all the generations after generations brought in to keep the whole thing going, and for what? The damn species went extinct anyway. In all the years preceding this inevitable point, how many died of starvation, the elements, were eaten alive by predators, or lay wounded in agony; crying out over and over until their last breath escaped them? How many species have come and gone that have followed this exact trajectory? Screwing around for a couple million years, creating shit tons of senseless pain in the meantime, playing out the same miserably reiterative cycle again and again, only to then die out anyway. Well, I'll you how many. 99% of all life. 99% of all life, ever, starting from the very first organisms to appear on this planet, are now extinct. They all followed the parameters of their DNA, did what they were programmed to do, struggled for their individual places in the useless battle royale of the natural world, only to eventually get swept away into entropy's compost bin regardless.
All animals live their lives based solely on fear and a desperate need to survive. Food, water, shelter, avoid predation, mate. That's it. Discounting a solitary orgasm somewhere along the way (assuming they're "lucky" enough to mate) there's no joy, no happiness, no satisfaction, no peace. These things are totally irrelevant to the replication of DNA. It can get by just fine without them. In fact, an organism could evolve to have their teeth tear into their own flesh from an early age, thereby causing each member of that species noticeable pain throughout their entire lives, but so long as it didn't get in the way of passing on DNA, that trait would probably remain untouched. Life perpetuates itself for its own sake, no matter the harm it causes. Like a fungus growing over a rotten stump, or a nasty mold spreading itself out within a musty cellar. At least a mold or a fungus doesn't create additional agents of suffering, the way life itself does. Cooking up more and more creatures that range from the grotesque to the nightmarish, like an idiot mad scientist that will make whatever it is they can manage to make simply because they can.
Those who worship and revere nature are fools at best, or sado-masochists at worst. They either outright refuse, or are utterly incapable of seeing/understanding how it really is. All they see; is what they wish to see. Everything else is ignored, or seen as something that just can't be helped. But, you know, that's where they're wrong. Something can be done about it and it's happening right this very moment. It's already been happening for decades. Perhaps even centuries if you want to go back far enough. A process of omnicide was set into motion, arguably when the industrial revolution occurred and, as of now, has just about run its course. By the end of this century, very little life will remain and, for all intents and purposes, the natural world will be no more.
I'm not saying that civilization isn't a monstrosity all its own, because it is, but through its continued existence its managed to kill the far greater monstrosity of the natural world. Our species could never have achieved a collective sense of enlightenment in regards to being able to work towards painlessly sterilizing the planet of life. But instead, through simple greed and myopia, the same end result will be achieved, only much more painfully; regrettable as that is. As someone who holds nature in contempt and that wishes to see its removal; I don't have to do anything. It's the nature lovers and pro-lifers that are accomplishing this task, which bears its own grim sense of irony. As a low carbon footprint efilist hermit, I leave a near microscopic impact on the planet. Yet the most die hard defenders of life and its supposed "sacredness" will pollute and consume more than fifty times the amount I ever will, while then breeding on top of all this, thereby adding an entire lifetimes worth of extra damage to the biosphere.
I wish to see nature ended; yet do very little actions to see that come to pass. Whereas those who revel in the inherently self-aggrandizing idea of nature; are the ones doing nearly everything possible to accelerate its demise. Now that right there is the sort of absurd juxtaposition I've long come to expect after existing in this dismal universe for so long now. There's certainly a grim sense of humor to be found in all this. Might as well laugh at the sheer comedy of our shared predicament, I suppose. Not that many will ever get the joke.