The increased gains of the right, at least in the West, can be observed to have a pattern that it tends to happen in countries with incredibly ineffectual left-wing alternatives, bought and paid for neolib parties that never seem to follow up on their promises, and no existent or effective popular movement to compensate. It is the right, as extreme and fascist as they are, who provide actual programs of long term sweeping reform and programs to change the order, as drastic as those policies may be. They provide hope for political change that the alternatives just never can.
Usually in a lot of cases, these right wing parties tend to fall apart, sometimes moderately in Poland where voter mobilization kicks them out, and sometimes accidentally and dramatically like what just happened in the UK where the Tories completely collapsed and Labor, which had basically the same electoral margins it had in 2019, is somehow able to pull a win they didn't see coming.
Rght wng candid8 jst dfeatd in Iran
BBC News - Reformist Masoud Pezeshkian elected Iran's president
The former heart surgeon has beaten his hardline conservative rival Saeed Jalili.
www.bbc.com
No sweeping changes to Iran can be expected here but it's nice to see a fundamental rejection of the conservative establishment by Iranian voters even despite the low turn-out. Still a good day for Iran.
According to ProleWiki (the communist version of Wikipedia), China is a "one of only five socialist states in the world today".
View attachment 143729
Sweden is very social democratic, but has nothing to do with Marxism–Leninism.
ProleWiki is not an actual source. Some guys online calling China actually-existing-socialism cannot magically undo the decades of economic reform under Deng Xiaoping, which continued with Augusto Pinochet being invited to China in the 90s to consult on economic affairs
twice (some commie he must have been, aye?), and finally in the present day where China is home to massive private corporations such as Tencent, but I imagine your rebuttal to that would be some sort of "uhh well China le corrupt" which, no, it's not not-capitalism just because it's corrupt.
And for the record, the Nazis invented the word "privatization" because of how much sections of the state they auctioned off to private buyers.