MissAbyss
Frikandel Speciaal
- Jul 20, 2025
- 392
https://sanctioned-suicide.net/thre...ponse-and-position-on-uk-jurisdiction.201773/ (after the first sentence, up til the last sentence of the first post)
"so this situation is fully understood" (AI red flag, as if full understanding is guaranteed after reading the text)
"to understand this situation" (human equivalent, the action 'understand', occurs before the thing acted on... 'this situation')
View attachment 186318View attachment 186317
not the worst post to use AI, i winhttps://sanctioned-suicide.net/thre...ponse-and-position-on-uk-jurisdiction.201773/ (after the first sentence, up til the last sentence of the first post)
"so this situation is fully understood" (AI red flag, as if full understanding is guaranteed after reading the text)
"to understand this situation" (human equivalent, the action 'understand', occurs before the thing acted on... 'this situation')
View attachment 186318View attachment 186317
In logged out private tab:Help a brother out, someone post a screenshot of this post plz
[Hidden content]
[Hidden content]
[Hidden content]
[Hidden content]
When logged in:Hidden content
You need -1 more posts to view this content (logged out)
Revealed content
Secrets!
idk if the number is hidden with -1 ... or not. I use HIDEPOSTS=1 coz a user who posted has to be approved... while logged in but unapproved users can access the Private forum... and probably HIDEGUESTS.thanks, confirms that you cannot specify the number of posts required to view content hidden by posts, unless i did it wrong.
i edited the above to include another set of tests.idk if the number is hidden with -1 ... or not. I use HIDEPOSTS=1 coz a user who posted has to be approved... while logged in but unapproved users can access the Private forum... and probably HIDEGUESTS.
mmm. And same results as the last one, -1 must be a placeholder. I think Xenforo should either change it to a more accurate number (non negative), or remove the number.i edited the above to include another set of tests.
but that's weird; even though specifying post count does nothing, it doesn't break the code and being logged out still hides it. unlike breaking the code with the REPLY one
[Hidden content]