Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
@Quarky00 : Your posts add *enormous* value, so please don't stop, even if the "polish" level is imperfect. Much better to get the info recorded.
Maybe we should use the wiki more, to allow ongoing editing (unless we can somehow allow that on this site).
Although I do believe in having 1 owner of a document, since "too many cooks".
Perhaps there's some method of transferring ownership when the original owner is inactive for a certain time period.
Maybe someone could look into how all that works and publish a short and sweet "how to use wiki" guide, but don't feel obliged to do that since I'm sure you're already very busy....
Maybe we should use the wiki more, to allow ongoing editing (unless we can somehow allow that on this site).
Although I do believe in having 1 owner of a document, since "too many cooks".
Perhaps there's some method of transferring ownership when the original owner is inactive for a certain time period.
Maybe someone could look into how all that works and publish a short and sweet "how to use wiki" guide, but don't feel obliged to do that since I'm sure you're already very busy....
Thanx Wish we could use Wiki -- proper hierarchy styling! Instead of table & bullets. Problem as mentioned that SWiki has little critical review or editorial input. "Don't Use Antacid with SN" (and other dangerous things).
~
STYLE
A good idea arose, to convert "Data Sheet" format to an "Article" format. I like article format. But that was a problem to begin with (for many members). Thus, this was meant as a quick reference, to solve a common problem: "I've read somewhere XYZ but can't find it..."
That's why I condensed it and used bullet points. I thought a table of questions (left column) was better to quickly locate an issue, with current styling constraints. Classical FAQ could be "a nice read", but for 80 questions without hierarchy - I think it'll be too much for many members. Wonder which is better for purpose, 1 or 2.
Not too sure... Keep in mind that "you can't please all of the people <etc>".
So I wouldn't worry too much....
If 5 people say something is "bad", there might be 30 people who think it's good but just never said anything.....
You'd have to do a survey and try to ensure both fans and non-fans take part to be able to build any meaningful picture, but then that could get a bit OTT....
I think your data sheet style is pretty good...
Not too sure... Keep in mind that "you can't please all of the people <etc>".
So I wouldn't worry too much....
If 5 people say something is "bad", there might be 30 people who think it's good but just never said anything.....
You'd have to do a survey and try to ensure both fans and non-fans take part to be able to build any meaningful picture, but then that could get a bit OTT....
I think your data sheet style is pretty good...
I'm not worried or into pleasing people, taking feedback to make it more readable . Maybe other formats are better . That's why I showed pros/cons . And exactly my goal -- let members opine :) Which they find comfortable as quick reference Q&A.. 1 or 2 ..
I'm not worried or into pleasing people, taking feedback to make it more readable . Maybe other formats are better . That's why I showed pros/cons . And exactly my goal -- let members opine :) Which they find comfortable as quick reference Q&A.. 1 or 2 ..
I wish, but thinking about compiling 3 FAQs (with recent additions and corrections etc) -
1. Storage, death, recovery (kinda the basics stuff)
2. AE, as it's a big deal ..
3. The rest :)
The reasoning is that, while I'd like one long reference, appears members find it hard to browse 100 questions over 14 subjects .. Also when I try to answer from the FAQ -- I myself find it hard to quickly locate things (lol). A table of contents with links would have solved that (go straigth to section) .
I wish, but thinking about compiling 3 FAQs (with recent additions and corrections etc) -
1. Storage, death, recovery (kinda the basics stuff)
2. AE, as it's a big deal ..
3. The rest :)
The reasoning is that, while I'd like one long reference, appears members find it hard to browse 100 questions over 14 subjects .. Also when I try to answer from the FAQ -- I myself find it hard to quickly locate things (lol). A table of contents with links would have solved that (go straigth to section) .
So like making a thread with a table of contents with the thread linked to each section (Overview, guide, FAQ, Extra--phytic acid stuff)
There are so many answers on thing no wonder people keep asking the same question over and even when using the search function it's not people can easily find their answers hence, asking the questions over and over.
There's got to be some sort of way to make it all organized. Sigh..
I'm not sure that if it will be more organized people will stop asking.
If instead of answered we'd provide link and say 'read' , like Jean4 said , they'd get the message .
As for a thread of links to subject , that's a good idea . It can also be "in one big thread" , like you wanted . First post will be table of contents, second post will be death , then recovery etc .. and the first post will contain links to all the other posts -- in the same thread . So on the one hand you can see everything on one page . And on the other hand you can link specific sections .
:)
I'm not sure that if it will be more organized people will stop asking.
If instead of answered we'd provide link and say 'read' , like Jean4 said , they'd get the message .
As for a thread of links to subject , that's a good idea . It can also be "in one big thread" , like you wanted . First post will be table of contents, second post will be death , then recovery etc .. and the first post will contain links to all the other posts -- in the same thread . So on the one hand you can see everything on one page . And on the other hand you can link specific sections .
:)
People won't stop asking even even if they're told to do research. They want direct answers which I understand since there's no pinned post of said method.
Not everyone will) would look at the Resources Compilation.
Is there someone that can do a thread post like that? I was just thinking of doing it in one post instead of separate posts in one thread.
Like
1. What SN does/what SN is
Provide an explanation here.
I believe it's a valid choice. People have used it before for their SN protocols...
Stan's guide generally says to take double whatever is stated on the packet....
I believe it's a valid choice. People have used it before for their SN protocols...
Stan's guide generally says to take double whatever is stated on the packet....
My notes : H2 BLOCKER / ANTACID
You should be able to find these over-the-counter.
Note : They are not considered to be essential.
Some people believe an antacid may be faster acting and more effective, but opinions vary. H2 blockers reduce the amount of acid your stomach makes, whereas antacid neutralises the acid already in your stomach.
H2 blockers : Tagamet (Cimetidine) / Zantac (Ranitidine), or supermarket own brands of cimetidine / ranitidine.
Antacid : I'm not sure what brand or type to recommend. I've seen Mylanta mentioned, but I can't say whether that's a good choice. Some people have used things such as Rennie or milk of magnesia.
Many people seem to go with Tagamet or Zantac, so you could just go with one of those.
Please take anything from above that seems worthwhile.
The other question that sometimes pops up is sodium bicarbonate... Apparently it used to be in the peaceful pill handbook, but was removed, but not sure why. If you confirm it's a bad idea and why, then that's worth adding to the FAQ.... (or just add it and state that it's assumed to not be a good choice, exact reasons to be determined). I suppose you could fire an email to exit intl to find out why it was removed....
You do like to make work for yourself don't you Doctor Quarky00
I honestly don't know, I prefer regulators like PPH, but can't say any antacid is good/bad. Stan said any simple thing will do the job. I hope they don't interact. We can't really know from success testimonials if that helped or not .. We need the same person to die twice, once with antacid and second time without
a more relaxed fasting practice, considering posts. This was mentioned in Stan's guide & replies. The reasoning is quick gastric emptying for fluids and simple sugars, return to normal pH an hour after emptying, and partially empty intestines sufficient for cause (explained in first quote).
Fasting timeline
Eat a light meal 5h before SN intake, and start fasting.
Some may consider 4h as enough, others will want 6h, etc.
Avoid alcohol.
Very few members may have indulged in a small serving (later ingested SN fatally), but it irritates stomach for few hours, changes acidity, slows metabolism.
Next 3 hours: You can drink water or non-acidic juices – in moderation.
For example juices/shakes made with either carrot, aloe, cabbage, beet, watermelon, spinach, cucumber, pear, etc.
Zolpidem– "Zolpidem is a nonbenzodiazepine Z drug which acts as a sedative and hypnotic." Sedative– "Iinduces sedation by reducing irritability or excitement. CNS depressants. Produce beneficial relaxing effects by increasing GABA activity."
Z-drugs have fewer of the full desirable effects, compared with those of benzos –
I honestly don't know, I prefer regulators like PPH, but can't say any antacid is good/bad. Stan said any simple thing will do the job. I hope they don't interact. We can't really know from success testimonials if that helped or not .. We need the same person to die twice, once with antacid and second time without
Dont understand the theory against PPIs. If you want to reduce the creation of stomach HCl, there is no better way. The only problem is it takes days, 3-5 days to become fully effective. Maybe that is the concern if someone takes it short term, it will not reduce HCl and therefore is pointless as a stat dose or even a day or two before the SN.
Thank you so much for creating this @Quarky00. Thank you for taking all the time and effort. Even though I mostly have my regime down and I am close to my ctb time now, I am always looking to refine the process with any new information, so this is most helpful to me. Thank you.
On a side note, someday somebody should do a time study in which they create one of these faqs and then time how long it takes for it to get completely screwed up with people asking the same question over and over.
I can't imagine that it takes very long before it gets completely messed up. That's why it's even more amazing when people like you take the time and effort to create one.
Really appreciate the effort here, @Quarky00. Any new insights on Milk of Magnesia? I know some had this on their regimen. This is the only antacid I can get a hold of. Does it help, or does not make a difference, so just better off without? Arguments have been made towards simplicity, so would like to know your thoughts.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.