
Dazedandconfused32
She was the worlds biggest mistake
- Jun 16, 2019
- 215
Oh gosh. This is just awful.I think there is at least one more in play at the moment.
UK users: Due to a formal investigation into this site by Ofcom under the UK Online Safety Act 2023, we strongly recommend using a trusted, no-logs VPN. This will help protect your privacy, bypass censorship, and maintain secure access to the site. Read the full VPN guide here.
Today, OFCOM launched an official investigation into Sanctioned Suicide under the UK’s Online Safety Act. This has already made headlines across the UK.
This is a clear and unprecedented overreach by a foreign regulator against a U.S.-based platform. We reject this interference and will be defending the site’s existence and mission.
In addition to our public response, we are currently seeking legal representation to ensure the best possible defense in this matter. If you are a lawyer or know of one who may be able to assist, please contact us at [email protected].
Read our statement here:
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Oh gosh. This is just awful.I think there is at least one more in play at the moment.
Rachel74 will no doubt have other profiles on here. I used to chat to Rachel74, thinking I was chatting to a 'fellow Brit'. Of course I have no idea who was behind the profile. A guy from somewhere totally different for all I know. What I do know is that the same person is probably on here now trying to befriend and scam other members. Probably a female profile, possibly with an age similar to 45 or so. We all need to keep vigilant and see if we can catch this scammer out as he tries to repeat his sick efforts. I do have a couple of ideas already...
Personally, I have some details on some scammers provided to me by fellow members. I feel in what I leave behind for the authorities regarding my notes, I might leave these details. It won't take long for their financial forensic teams to follow the money trail. My research on the subject shows that they can even get to the point that it will go to a photo of someone taking money out of an atm machine or ip adresses of the online management of the money.
Do you not have enough evidence to present to the admins to get them banned?
I mean authorities. I'm off this planet soon enough and if I can put some scum in the target sights of authorities, I would class it as a public service. I have enough details on one to start a forensic money trail investigation. That person could go down for a list of crimes ranging from (weirdly) money laundering if they gave false details in setting up their money collection account to conspiracy with intent. The other idiot left enough details that I even have enough information that I worked out how to send them a christmas card if I wanted to.Do you not have enough evidence to present to the admins to get them banned?
I agree with that 100%!Unfortunately, there will always be scammers on here which is why this thread should be re-pinned.
I still think a weekly warning email should go out. its the new members who are at the most riskUnfortunately, there will always be scammers on here which is why this thread should be re-pinned.
Don't hold your breathI still think a weekly warning email should go out.
But would they go after them or would they go after this site- if their scamming is taking place here- could it effect both negatively I mean?Thank you for going after them. I hope the authorities respond.
Unfortunately, there will always be scammers on here which is why this thread should be re-pinned.
This site would be safe otherwise I would not be doing it. Already checked. Such as facebook and the likes are not liable for scams as it is not their business. Sites like Amazon, ebay etc would be as they are marketplaces.But would they go after them or would they go after this site- if their scamming is taking place here- could it effect both negatively I mean?
I mean authorities. I'm off this planet soon enough and if I can put some scum in the target sights of authorities, I would class it as a public service. I have enough details on one to start a forensic money trail investigation. That person could go down for a list of crimes ranging from (weirdly) money laundering if they gave false details in setting up their money collection account to conspiracy with intent. The other idiot left enough details that I even have enough information that I worked out how to send them a christmas card if I wanted to.
The best and correct way is to keep the mods up to date with any suspicious activity. Also, without naming name, post here with the content of the suspected scam, but not the member name. let the mods deal with the member in the correct way.would you be willing to disclose what you've learned so that those details are preserved after you intend to leave, PM me if so because i was looking into this too
eww wait theres more than 1 ?
The best and correct way is to keep the mods up to date with any suspicious activity. Also, without naming name, post here with the content of the suspected scam, but not the member name. let the mods deal with the member in the correct way.
My concern would be : would this bring unwanted attention to this forum ?I mean authorities. I'm off this planet soon enough and if I can put some scum in the target sights of authorities, I would class it as a public service. I have enough details on one to start a forensic money trail investigation. That person could go down for a list of crimes ranging from (weirdly) money laundering if they gave false details in setting up their money collection account to conspiracy with intent. The other idiot left enough details that I even have enough information that I worked out how to send them a christmas card if I wanted to.
Banning people does nothing, they will come back under a different name. Have to hit them harder than they hit hit you.
That actually made me laugh out loud. So a scammer is not 'unwanted attention'? As I said before, done some research, this board is not liable. It even has 'no marketplace' clearly written in its rules. I have seen the effect scammers have had on the vulnerable members here and heard their stories.My concern would be : would this bring unwanted attention to this forum ?
This forum is a literal life-saver (hmm, hold on a sec.....) for a LOT of people.
Anything that would risk this forum has to be considered a BAD thing.....
My thought was it's still better to have this site even though there may be some scammers here (as terrible as that is), than to not have this site, which would leave a huge number of people in dire straits.That actually made me laugh out loud. So a scammer is not 'unwanted attention'? As I said before, done some research, this board is not liable. It even has 'no marketplace' clearly written in its rules. I have seen the effect scammers have had on the vulnerable members here and heard their stories.
To also think that this site is also not being monitored on a frequent basis is also rather short sighted.
Have you spoken to someone who had very little money left in their savings and lost it to a scammer? The aftermath that causes to that individual? If you have then you will understand my aggression.My thought was it's still better to have this site even though there may be some scammers here (as terrible as that is), than to not have this site, which would leave a huge number of people in dire straits.
I guess you better understand the legal framework than me regarding whether this site could get shut down, but I hope you're certain in that regard, because as we know authorities can have a tendency to interpret laws in the way that suits them....
Your "Laugh out loud" seems a bit aggressive. I was just trying to raise a concern.
If my concern is unfounded then that's great, and people can just explain why it's unfounded...
Most people seem to suggest he's not trustworthy. Try searching his name in the search box ( scroll to top, then look in top right corner ).does anyone know if d is reliable? He is in the PPH, but they say that they have poor information about him.
Caution needed re reporting scammers as they may have personal information about the people they scammed which may get those people into problems . The scammers will not hesitaTE TO lie and blaMe others ....
does anyone know if d is reliable? He is in the PPH, but they say that they have poor information about him.
D is Domingo. He has conned his way into PPH by deceiving Exit and Philip. He is not reliable like A and many have reported in this forum that he is a confirmed con man. Be aware!Who is d?
D is Domingo. He has conned his way into PPH by deceiving Exit and Philip. He is not reliable like A and many have reported in this forum that he is a confirmed con man. Be aware!