
R. A.
But...the future refused to change.
- Aug 8, 2022
- 1,066
Unsure if this is really a "game"; was hoping but failed to find any tool to make it more easy to "play"...
Anyway, I thought it'd be neat to share "stats" of what ratio of reaction's we've got. Everyone's total is always visible, but what about the nitty gritty? I suspect almost everyone will have mostly "likes", but what about the rest?
As of posting, my total is 3,160. I'm gonna do the hard work and percentage everything with a calculator, in case anyone else wants to "play" like that later on (rounding up to the nearest whole number). To do this simply divide the total amount of a particular reaction by your overall total (e.g. for my likes: 1687÷3160).
= 53%
= 3%
= 15%
= 3%
= 22%
= 3%
= 0% (less than half)
The fun for me is in seeing how much of each reaction I've got; hopefully people will wanna find this out too! Just enter xxx/yyy into a search engine and it will tell you, then swap out the xxx for all the other individual reaction totals.
That said, a screenshot or breakdown of the numbers is also fine. It's a bit more work to punch them all in.
Anyway, I thought it'd be neat to share "stats" of what ratio of reaction's we've got. Everyone's total is always visible, but what about the nitty gritty? I suspect almost everyone will have mostly "likes", but what about the rest?
As of posting, my total is 3,160. I'm gonna do the hard work and percentage everything with a calculator, in case anyone else wants to "play" like that later on (rounding up to the nearest whole number). To do this simply divide the total amount of a particular reaction by your overall total (e.g. for my likes: 1687÷3160).








The fun for me is in seeing how much of each reaction I've got; hopefully people will wanna find this out too! Just enter xxx/yyy into a search engine and it will tell you, then swap out the xxx for all the other individual reaction totals.
That said, a screenshot or breakdown of the numbers is also fine. It's a bit more work to punch them all in.
Last edited: