
Crazy4u
Enlightened
- Sep 29, 2021
- 1,318
Is there a big difference between the two in terms of CTB effectiveness? N is way more expensive. Why is it considered better than SN?
⚠️ UK Access Block Notice: Beginning July 1, 2025, this site will no longer be accessible from the United Kingdom. This is a voluntary decision made by the site's administrators. We were not forced or ordered to implement this block. If you're located in the UK, we recommend using a VPN to maintain access.
N is an anaesthetic. When they use it for euthanasia it's just an anaesthetic given at a fatal dose. SN is a poison not meant to be used in any medical or biological way.Is there a big difference between the two in terms of CTB effectiveness? N is way more expensive. Why is it considered better than SN?
Yuppp. I'm so tired of seeing some SN survivors blaming the SN for not being 100% peaceful like N when they did the EXACT opposite of the protocol.N is an anaesthetic. When they use it for euthanasia it's just an anaesthetic given at a fatal dose. SN is a poison not meant to be used in any medical or biological way.
So N is peaceful like an anaesthetic is peaceful. SN is a poison. That's why you need antiemetics, antacids, benzos etc. Well you don't NEED them but they help make the method more peaceful. But it will never be as peaceful as N.
To be fair chemist in the netherlands stated that sn most defnitly is a painfull method. And those are chemists that work together with euthanasia clinics. Sn is a bit overated when it comes to peacefulness but there isnt much choiseYuppp. I'm so tired of seeing some SN survivors blaming the SN for not being 100% peaceful like N when they did the EXACT opposite of the protocol.
Painful in what way?To be fair chemist in the netherlands stated that sn most defnitly is a painfull method. And those are chemists that work together with euthanasia clinics. Sn is a bit overated when it comes to peacefulness but there isnt much choise
N is an anaesthetic. When they use it for euthanasia it's just an anaesthetic given at a fatal dose. SN is a poison not meant to be used in any medical or biological way.
So N is peaceful like an anaesthetic is peaceful. SN is a poison. That's why you need antiemetics, antacids, benzos etc. Well you don't NEED them but they help make the method more peaceful. But it will never be as peaceful as N.
Oh well you learn something new every day! Thanks!Yes, and also N was used as a sleeping medicine before barbiturates/Z-drugs.
SN is actually used medically as an "antidote" for cyanide poisoning. But probably not that common nowadays.
Of course I meant benzodiazepines/Z-drugs not barbiturates/z-drugs.Oh well you learn something new every day! Thanks!
me2 because I have sensitive stomach. Can you elaborate on the H?There isn't much of a difference between the two if taken orally. If you can get N at 400mg/ml, and inject it, that would be substantially better.
Personally, I would rather od on H iv than take something orally.
even if it was painful, it doesn't seem to be so painful. This is death after all.Painful in what way?
I don't know tbh. I think you wind up just passing out. I remember one person on here tried to od by H, didn't take enough, and survived. She had some lingering nerve and/or brain damage. So kind of risky. At the same time, you are junkies with crazy high tolerances od all the time. I think if you are even considering going this way, you need a way to test the purity of the H. Once confirmed, I would go way overboard, like 20x a lethal dose.me2 because I have sensitive stomach. Can you elaborate on the H?
I get mixed opinions on it. Some ppl say od on H is very peaceful.