• New TOR Mirror: suicidffbey666ur5gspccbcw2zc7yoat34wbybqa3boei6bysflbvqd.onion

  • Hey Guest,

    If you want to donate, we have a thread with updated donation options here at this link: About Donations

Darkover

Darkover

Illuminated
Jul 29, 2021
3,740
is it even morally right to have a child?

IMO it is always morally wrong to have a child.

Even if you are of the opinion that there is more good than bad in this world, we have an obligation not to bring harm to others, we have no obligation to bring them happiness.

Children never ask to be created, they are always created due to the whims of their parents. Creating a thinking and feeling being, with the knowledge that there is no certainty you can provide or protect it, is wrong.

if the child ends up hating life on the whole, then it will turn out that producing them was wrong.

I'm a firm proponent of "don't have kids if you can't afford kids" which imo is not controversial. It's not eugenics. It's exactly the same as "You shouldn't get x animal if you can't provide y enclosure"

is it really moral to have children? People argue about the morality of abortion and suicide yet they never stop to think about the fact that a child is forcefully brought into existence. The child is then forced to follow the doctrines of their parents and gain whatever schooling they can.

If it is considered immoral and selfish to forcefully take one's life (i.e. murder or suicide) then why is it considered moral to forcefully give life? There is no permission given to parents, they selfishly bring a child into existence. Not everyone wants to exist.

Why do people celebrate the birth of babies when all they have to look forward to is the drudgery of school, college, and jobs?

I find it difficult to celebrate the fact that another human is subjected to the prison sentence that is this capitalistic life. It feels disingenuous to congratulate someone for becoming pregnant, as everyone else does.

Life is far from perfect. Pain, suffering, and indifference are not only common but guaranteed. Plus when we consider that work takes up the vast majority of our waking hours, it's hard to imagine why we would willingly subject someone else to this kind of existence.

I think it's important to acknowledge that the challenges of life are real and that not everyone will have the same positive experiences. In my view, life is 33% sleep, 40-50% work, and the rest is recreation/pleasure - and that's not a ratio worth celebrating.

I don't mean to be too negative, but I would rather congratulate someone for getting a vasectomy or hysterectomy. By doing so, they're giving their potential child the best gift possible - avoiding the struggles and hardships that come with living in this world.
 
The Schizoid

The Schizoid

Specialist
Oct 24, 2023
308
I'm never having kids. I'd be a terrible parent. I have no interest in children.

I personally am not sure if I'm a complete Anti Natalist yet, because it seems extreme that we would believe that the only way to deal with this problem is to just go extinct altogether.

If you're not having kids in the hope that it will contribute to an anti-natalist world, you're going to be disappointed. Much of the world is still anti-abortion, poor people are still having tonnes of kids.

I think it's immoral to have kids if you aren't sure you can provide a good life.

That being said it's never guaranteed someone has a good life despite a healthy upbringing. This is why assisted suicide should be legal because you shouldn't be imprisoned into a reality you did not consent to coming into in the first place.
 
Pluto

Pluto

Meowing to go out
Dec 27, 2020
3,414
The problem as I see it is that people should be making decisions based on a solid understanding of what they are getting themselves into.

And yet, the many parents who confess that they regret having children (even though in most cases they do love their children) are largely censored and tabooed by society.

One could also argue that people are asked to consider the environment when choosing whether to recycle an aluminium can, yet the question does not arise when bringing an entire being who will be consuming resources for the next 100 years. (I say 100 because human lifespans are increasing constantly. It could well be 120 for people born today, in theory.)
 
R_N

R_N

-Memento Mori-
Dec 3, 2019
1,410
There is no state that is "ethical" in my opinion.

It sounds extreme but so is nature. To live is to devour to survive and beings interacting with one another is bound to create pain in other ways too.

There are moments where beings experience pleasure but all that leads to is more craving and more pain in the long run.

It is a bottomless pit.
 
sserafim

sserafim

brighter than the sun, that's just me
Sep 13, 2023
7,365
There is no state that is "ethical" in my opinion.

It sounds extreme but so is nature. To live is to devour to survive and beings interacting with one another is bound to create pain in other ways too.

There are moments where beings experience pleasure but all that leads to is more craving and more pain in the long run.

It is a bottomless pit.
Why do you think that nature is so cruel?
 
The Schizoid

The Schizoid

Specialist
Oct 24, 2023
308
Yeah but to survive in nature, animals have to literally fight, kill and eat other living beings…seems pretty cruel to me. We also have to kill and eat other living beings.
True but death can be painful in other ways without being killed.

Being killed by a crocodile is excruciating for about 3 minutes. Dying of a terminal illness can be excruciating for months.

But we may experience beauty before that happens. The pain/suffering may just be the cost of admission. But unfortunately some people get unlucky and experience way more suffering than peace.
 
R_N

R_N

-Memento Mori-
Dec 3, 2019
1,410
I don't disagree with anything both of you said so it would just be me explaining my wording.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sserafim
FuneralCry

FuneralCry

She wished that she never existed...
Sep 24, 2020
34,102
I find it disgusting how many humans so harmfully and cruelly decide to procreate even know there is literally no limit as to how much agony one can feel in this existence. All that those who procreate do is create unnecessary suffering and torment, it's tragic to me how this repulsive species hasn't gone voluntarily extinct yet.
 
Adûnâi

Adûnâi

Little Russian in-cel
Apr 25, 2020
828
Why do you think that nature is so cruel?
Because the creator god is a sick sadistic mentally-deranged psychopath.

Good question, unironically. If one doesn't want all life to end, he's either sadistic, or retarded. Incidentally, this is why I don't consider genocide and slavery to be evil - having kids is effectively worse than paedophilia, everything about life is vile and abominable, what's the point singling things out? If you're not gonna kill yourself, might as well go with the Nietzschean "yea to life".
 
F

FloodedForest

Member
Nov 4, 2023
9
I brought two girls into this world and I don't regret it. Sure we don't have an exciting life as much as I'd like them to have, and we have our struggles, but no child is born depressed or anxious.
As a parent, I feel it's my job now to protect them from ever feeling how I turned out, until everything gets on top of me.

I have loving parents and family who tell me they love me, even if I feel like the disappointment in the family. I just wish they did more to help me growing up, and maybe I wouldn't think this way.

The world isn't a terrible place per say, but it can be a hella lot more scarier to some people and situations out of your own control.
 
M

Meteora

Ignorance is bliss
Jun 27, 2023
1,332
Don't think it is unethical. It's just so much harder to raise a child in this society than it was 40 years ago. It requires a lot more of the parents and I believe, many fail because it is almost inhumane what parents should do.
 
B

betternever2havbeen

Elementalist
Jun 19, 2022
815
Yes it's unethical, but there's fuck all to do on this planet except create more people it seems. I think it's about control, you make a new person and you get to control them for ~18 years and parents get off on that. I'm convinced they see their kids as their own property to a certain extent.
 
wastingpotential

wastingpotential

drowning, always.
Feb 8, 2023
131
i don't expect any generation past gen Z to live past their twenties or less normally given the state of our climate and whatnot. don't get me fucking started on basic human rights that most people in charge still think of as a 'political debate'
 
uniqueusername4

uniqueusername4

Member
Aug 13, 2023
85
I personally believe it is unethical to have children. You can't ask someone's consent for them to come into this world. I would've preferred to not have existed.

It is definitely unethical to have children when we know they are bound for a terrible life such as we have as slaves to capitalism.
 
divinemistress36

divinemistress36

Enlightened
Jan 1, 2024
1,528
Look at how skinny the cubs are. Those lions were starving. Sad that the warthog was the food. But with no guns, no missiles, and no bombs, that's nature.
That's true its the sound of the warthog was horrific but it's nature. I kind of wish I would get eaten to death
 
Onomatopoeia

Onomatopoeia

Student
Feb 17, 2024
172
That's true its the sound of the warthog was horrific but it's nature. I kind of wish I would get eaten to death

You absolutely do not wish you were eaten to death like that. Look at that warthog. Its guts are hanging out, it is being ripped apart, and somehow it is still alive and screaming. That is the worst death ever. And it happens to humans daily, except it is just for fun and not survival and eating like the lions. This whole world is f*d up.
 
Last edited:
sceáwere

sceáwere

Member
Mar 5, 2024
8
I believe most people here have hereditary mental illnesses, so breeding a child as dysgenic as you to suffer just as much as you (likely even more due to you having to settle for a very dysgenic spouse in order to compensate for your own low value) would very much be immoral from a utilitarian point of view.
 
Justnotme

Justnotme

...
Mar 7, 2022
515
This warthog would like a word with you.


The nature of this world is the most vile and cruel thing that can be in the universe. The universe is a real nasty and cruel bastard that I would destroy without even thinking about it.

I thought that animals first clamp the carotid arteries with their fangs, then gnaw through them so that the victim dies before being eaten.
It's horrible.

This whole place is cruelty and filth.
 
The Schizoid

The Schizoid

Specialist
Oct 24, 2023
308
This warthog would like a word with you.


How is this cruel?

The lions aren't doing this because they enjoy seeing the Warthog suffer. Animals don't torture each other, they kill each other for food, territory, to protect themselves or their young, or just out of fear in general.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Ninth God