N
noname223
Archangel
- Aug 18, 2020
- 7,075
I guess many on here would say so called "generative artifical intelligence". My friends would probably say that.
I am not sure what I would choose. I can see how generative articifical intelligence ruins the internet. And the internet is a very important coping mechanism for me.
I think deep fake videos and pictures would be something that I could agree on banning.
You know nuclear weapons have some purpose. The cold war would have escalated a lot more presumably if there would not have been MAD (mutual assured destruction).
But explain that to the people from Nagasaki and Hiroshima that nuclear weapons had positive sides too.
Most technologies can be abused and were abused.
Something I would not eradicate electricity. Lol. However, very likely no one on here would exist if humans didn't invent electricity. The population would be probably a lot smaller. And you don't have to be Ted Kaczynski to see that the way how humans live in modern societies is sort of alienating.
I am not sure what I would choose. I can see how generative articifical intelligence ruins the internet. And the internet is a very important coping mechanism for me.
I think deep fake videos and pictures would be something that I could agree on banning.
You know nuclear weapons have some purpose. The cold war would have escalated a lot more presumably if there would not have been MAD (mutual assured destruction).
But explain that to the people from Nagasaki and Hiroshima that nuclear weapons had positive sides too.
Most technologies can be abused and were abused.
Something I would not eradicate electricity. Lol. However, very likely no one on here would exist if humans didn't invent electricity. The population would be probably a lot smaller. And you don't have to be Ted Kaczynski to see that the way how humans live in modern societies is sort of alienating.