N
noname223
Archangel
- Aug 18, 2020
- 6,029
The whole thing does not have to be fully good but it should have a good aspect.
There was a edgy David Foster Wallace story in Brief interviews with hideous men. There is the claim there was something positive about the holocaust. Without the holocaust Viktor Frankl could have never writen such good books, helping others. It is speculative whether the author really believed that.
I discussed this topic with the woman I dated and almost was in a relationship with. Her most edgy take was actually a massive genocide of 90% of humankind would have a positive effect on the climate and humanity would sort of profit from it. (She had a very high IQ.) I knew she wanted kids and I just told her that something like antinatalism exists and she called that crazy. Lol. I think though her stances were more nuanced but I won't go into details. I told her I think the rich and powerful have the highest CO2 emission and exactly these people would probably survive such a mass genocide.
I don't fully buy it. There is the theodicy question. Why is there suffering? Because suffering has a meaning? But which meaning has it if a child with 4 dies from cancer in agony? Maybe the pain stopped. but why does an almighty God let that happen. (creating such illnesses)
There was a edgy David Foster Wallace story in Brief interviews with hideous men. There is the claim there was something positive about the holocaust. Without the holocaust Viktor Frankl could have never writen such good books, helping others. It is speculative whether the author really believed that.
I discussed this topic with the woman I dated and almost was in a relationship with. Her most edgy take was actually a massive genocide of 90% of humankind would have a positive effect on the climate and humanity would sort of profit from it. (She had a very high IQ.) I knew she wanted kids and I just told her that something like antinatalism exists and she called that crazy. Lol. I think though her stances were more nuanced but I won't go into details. I told her I think the rich and powerful have the highest CO2 emission and exactly these people would probably survive such a mass genocide.
I don't fully buy it. There is the theodicy question. Why is there suffering? Because suffering has a meaning? But which meaning has it if a child with 4 dies from cancer in agony? Maybe the pain stopped. but why does an almighty God let that happen. (creating such illnesses)