Nor is it realistic for you to imply that the only two options should be either letting anyone say anything unquestioned or unchallenged, or reporting them directly to mods for post deletion. In fact, that kind of passive-agressive, all-or-nothing scenario would be more unhealthy than the situation you are currently taking issue with.
This is not at all what I implied. I never suggested they or anyone were exempt.
I said members have the right to express themselves without judgement but there are cases that cross the line and should be dealt with by mods. What I didn't state but is assumed is that mods would need to be notified by members who read and potentially respond. And I do believe these cases subject themselves to harsh criticism.
I suggested how a response might look that didn't cast judgement, in this case, on the OP. That suggested example addressed all the things you mentioned without judgment or words that imply ridicule or inferiority.
And I said It is not the intent of the response but the tone that causes the OP to feel attacked, belittled or judged.
. I find it puzzling that such behaviour doesn't seem to even raise an eyebrow from you, but my commenting to OP about those plans is such a cause for your concern.
i suggested that maybe the OP was (those ridiculing words) but no need to be judge and jury here.
I suggested a non judgmental but direct response that addresses the concerns of the remarks made by OP.
The OP stated what made things worse for them, when they're suicidal... calling the authorities makes them feel they are not being helped as they need. I can relate to this feeling.
Their statement to call the GP before taking SN isn't threatening (to me), Drs are trained how to handle these things so I encourage OP to call the Dr. Doing so is stupid if the intent is ctb.
I agree with this. Though it might not be my place since I'm still so new, I think autumnal raises a valid point. I'm tempted to give OP the benefit of the doubt and assume that their plan of action towards their doctor was an impulsive fantasy born out of anger over the actions taken by their doctor, which I understand. But on the off chance that they were serious, I do believe it's important to be reminded of the implications of such an 'act of revenge' because at that point it stops being about the OP only but involves potentially harming other people whose motivations for their actions were likely only concern and a wish to help. 'Punishing' someone for this is petty and spiteful in my opinion and one has to realise that one is potentially doing severe emotional damage to a person who was either only concerned and trying to help or possibly even following standard protocol which is mandated by law.
It is not the need to address the OPs behavior that I took issuewith, It's how it's done. By all means address it, Without a belittling or condescending tone.
And if OP calls the DR before SN, they are perhaps seeking attn and not intending to die because this act will most likely result in being saved. Unless OP is in an area where ems cannot reach them for at least over an hour, like the middle of the woods, because their phone will be tracked.
When a post or response is violating, hurtful, disgusting or similar by all means, let the OP have it. This wasn't the case. Childish? Yes.