RainAndSadness
Administrator
- Jun 12, 2018
- 2,187
They should've linked to the site instead of posting that cucked shit at the end.
They did mention this forum by its name, actually. Pretty much all people that are trying to register as a result of that article are expressing genuine intentions to join this community. The New York Times essentially lead hundreds of possibly desperate people - in the age of endless lockdowns - to a website that discusses peaceful methods. It's the most irresponsible thing they could have done considering their narrative about this website but I think "suicide prevention" isn't that important if you can boost traffic towards your article that way, right... Regardless, this article doesn't fulfill any journalistic standards, I've rarely seen such a grotesque article before.
Last edited: