They did mention this forum by its name, actually. Pretty much all people that are trying to register as a result of that article are expressing genuine intentions to join this community. The New York Times essentially lead hundreds of possibly desperate people - in the age of endless lockdowns - to a website that discusses peaceful methods. It's the most irresponsible thing they could have done considering their narrative about this website but I think "suicide prevention" isn't that important if you can boost traffic towards your article that way, right... Regardless, this article doesn't fulfill any journalistic standards, I've rarely seen such a grotesque article before.
I had never heard about SN, until one day I saw an article in on a news website in my country where they carried out a police operation to arrest people who allegedly helped others to commit suicide.
In the article, they clearly showed conversations between a person who committed suicide and members of the group, mentioning SN, CTB.
After I saw this article, I easily found the SS.
I think, like me, thousands of others are looking for a less painful way to do the CTB, and now with this story on the NYT we're going to have a lot more people joining the SS.
Here I found a place to speak freely, without fear or censorship, everything I feel, respecting the pain of each one. Listening to other people and opinions, and all this has done me good.
The pain of each one of us is legitimate.
Whether with or without CTB, the best is always wanted here.
They are concerned with censoring to try to lower the suicide rates, when in reality they are just selfish and don't want to deal with their relatives' problems. Wanting someone who is suffering to stay is not love. It's selfishness.
I'm exhausted hearing from people that I'm strong and that everything will get better. I can't see the beauty in all this misery in my life.