• UK users: Due to a formal investigation into this site by Ofcom under the UK Online Safety Act 2023, we strongly recommend using a trusted, no-logs VPN. This will help protect your privacy, bypass censorship, and maintain secure access to the site. Read the full VPN guide here.

  • Hey Guest,

    Today, OFCOM launched an official investigation into Sanctioned Suicide under the UK’s Online Safety Act. This has already made headlines across the UK.

    This is a clear and unprecedented overreach by a foreign regulator against a U.S.-based platform. We reject this interference and will be defending the site’s existence and mission.

    In addition to our public response, we are currently seeking legal representation to ensure the best possible defense in this matter. If you are a lawyer or know of one who may be able to assist, please contact us at [email protected].

    Read our statement here:

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC): 34HyDHTvEhXfPfb716EeEkEHXzqhwtow1L
    Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9
    Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVSDD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8
TAW122

TAW122

Emissary of the right to die.
Aug 30, 2018
6,963
I'm going to go with @WayOut here and just refrain from arguing with them. The best case scenario (winning the argument - which is already very difficult and arduous to do) doesn't really get me anything or anywhere, just a waste of mental energy, and time. The worse case scenario, of course, is them becoming concerned and start to threaten forced treatment or intervention, thus foiling one's plans to ctb as well as other horrible consequences, making life even worse than it is.

I suppose the best way is to argue via proxy if ever. By that, I mean whenever the topic of euthanasia, terminal illness, and incurable diseases come up, then indirectly mention that death is better than suffering if death is imminent and one has limited time to live while suffering unbearably (cancer, and other illnesses).
 
  • Like
Reactions: color_me_gone and Redt2go
H

HanginAround

Member
Jan 10, 2019
23
I'm going to go with @WayOut here and just refrain from arguing with them. The best case scenario (winning the argument - which is already very difficult and arduous to do) doesn't really get me anything or anywhere, just a waste of mental energy, and time. The worse case scenario, of course, is them becoming concerned and start to threaten forced treatment or intervention, thus foiling one's plans to ctb as well as other horrible consequences, making life even worse than it is.

I suppose the best way is to argue via proxy if ever. By that, I mean whenever the topic of euthanasia, terminal illness, and incurable diseases come up, then indirectly mention that death is better than suffering if death is imminent and one has limited time to live while suffering unbearably (cancer, and other illnesses).

I like the game theory argument the best. It's simple. Life is a game. If you don't enjoy playing, you shouldn't have to. And as a response to the "why do you have to enjoy it?" question I ask back "if you don't, then why play?"

I also think of it like Suicidal Pascal's Wager. If you know you'll die at the end, then you need only stay around if you place value on the time left. Value of time, just like how we value all other things, is person and circumstance specific.
 
  • Like
Reactions: color_me_gone and -L-
D

Deleted member 1496

Student
Aug 2, 2018
183
Agreed this is great. An amazing post and a great argument. Original?

Yup, it's original. I was writing the back and forth pro-life vs pro-choice arguments, but it became so convoluted. Regardless of what choice said, pro-life was irrationally absolute. But who decided that us choice folks are the irrational ones? Pro-lifers, friends and family, mental health professionals, popular society. So then I hit delete and started writing about mayo! Glad you liked it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: color_me_gone and Redt2go
Redt2go

Redt2go

flower child
Jan 5, 2019
1,643
Yup, it's original. I was writing the back and forth pro-life vs pro-choice arguments, but it became so convoluted. Regardless of what choice said, pro-life was irrationally absolute. But who decided that us choice folks are the irrational ones? Pro-lifers, friends and family, mental health professionals, popular society. So then I hit delete and started writing about mayo! Glad you liked it!
I understand pro life people though. As there are a lot of suicidal people who don't want to die but feel hopeless. Also for those who truly want to go death is extremely traumatic

And yes :) wordsmith you are
 
  • Like
Reactions: color_me_gone
SeekingSolace

SeekingSolace

‘The sleep of reason breeds monsters’ -Goya
Jan 28, 2019
139
A question that could get deeply philosophical.

But for my simple brain, I like this one from the Urban Dictionary:

"Very often, a pro-lifer is a bible beater without a grasp on anything except their futile task of trying scientifically prove a book without risking disproving it."
That's a great description.
 
  • Like
Reactions: color_me_gone
D

Deleted member 1496

Student
Aug 2, 2018
183
I understand pro life people though. As there are a lot of suicidal people who don't want to die but feel hopeless. Also for those who truly want to go death is extremely traumatic

And yes :) wordsmith you are


Oh, I'm not anti-recovery or anti-life. I've helped people who didn't want to die and am happy when someone here posts about their recovery. My problem is that except for this site, suicidal people can't talk about their ideation objectively. A pro-lifer argued that choosing suicide is "dumb" and my last therapist threatened to call the cops if I continued to talk about it. So, I shut up. But being silent or deemed dumb doesn't help me not to commit suicide.

After reading about complex trauma, attachment disorder, etc., I learned my reactions are typical and normal, even if they're not in the DSM. Nevertheless, all suicidal people are treated as if we must be crazy or irrational. But that's not the treatment some of us need. What would help is if they understood--and accepted as rational and logical--our feelings and we started from there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redt2go
Redt2go

Redt2go

flower child
Jan 5, 2019
1,643
Oh, I'm not anti-recovery or anti-life. I've helped people who didn't want to die and am happy when someone here posts about their recovery. My problem is that except for this site, suicidal people can't talk about their ideation objectively. A pro-lifer argued that choosing suicide is "dumb" and my last therapist threatened to call the cops if I continued to talk about it. So, I shut up. But being silent or deemed dumb doesn't help me not to commit suicide.

After reading about complex trauma, attachment disorder, etc., I learned my reactions are typical and normal, even if they're not in the DSM. Nevertheless, all suicidal people are treated as if we must be crazy or irrational. But that's not the treatment some of us need. What would help is if they understood--and accepted as rational and logical--our feelings and we started from there.
I wasn't assuming anything about you. I was just stating my opinion. Yeah I wish suicidal people weren't treated as irrational or crazy too.
 

Similar threads

N
Replies
2
Views
249
Suicide Discussion
ThatStateOfMind
T
Droso
Replies
3
Views
204
Suicide Discussion
Linda
Linda
Wilt-On-High
Replies
13
Views
458
Suicide Discussion
wantingdignity
wantingdignity
Darkover
Replies
12
Views
256
Offtopic
Forever Sleep
F