Tbh if the world were run by autistics, there would be no world. The executive dysfunction that comes with autism is huuuuuuge. I work with disabled adults to teach life skills and most of my low-functioning clients can't even use the restroom on their own. Found that out the hard way when a client pissed herself everywhere. Another client got physically violent with a lady at autism support group last week because she wanted a sticker. The higher-functioning side may fare a bit better but even then I'm trying to teach them how to feed themselves and it's too much for them
You're autistic and able to hold down a job working with them. I imagine you can feed yourself right?
Autism is a spectrum that ranges wildly in severity and I imagine the quality of life varies greatly depending on social supports and environment. The unemployment rate for autistics is high but many companies are working on trying to recruite them. How successful these efforts will be, idk.
I worked for a group home that was underfunded and understaffed. Our nonverbal autistic client never got to go out and the excuse was "she'll run away" or "we have no staff." I suggested teaching her sign language and "that will overwhelm her." No one put the effort into teaching her different ways to communicate. The way society treats autistics is horrible. Few funding and people lock them in group homes and treat them like dangers and animals.
Personally I think autistic people of all degrees make the world more interesting and I wish they had more support and funding.
I think of it like this: selective abortions are a 100% effective way to prevent a human being from suffering through this world. Whether an embryo would've been one of the lucky few who didn't suffer is a moot point because that is merely a hypothetical person. Disabled people who already exist deserve access to quality services and bodily autonomy. Disabled people who don't exist should remain that way.
Selective breeding should be up to the individual. Making it state mandated creates a slippery slope because who is and isn't "undesirable" is subjective, and many people in support of mass genocide of "undesirables" would oppose policies that would enhance their lives. You could argue trans people are "undesirable" because they don't conform and have gender dysphoria. If a trans person wants to commit suicide it is their business. If a trans person wants access to medical and social transitioning and finds it helps, they should have that right.
The Nazis were opposed to trans gender people and shut down gender clinics that stalled progress. Obviously if a pregnant person wants genetic screening and an abortion as a result, that is their right, but no one should be encouraged or forced to get an abortion against their will. That goes against pro-choice and pro bodily autonomy ideals.
Bleach?! Man, people make me sick…
Well at least we agree on something.
Also I know you were joking but lobotomies caused so much suffering for people. Honestly you don't sound like someone who supports the alleviation of suffering inasmuch as someone who supports the discrimination and bigotry of those who are different.