I did not intentionally ignore anything and thought I answered your questions. I am happy to discuss this with you, but please ease back a bit. I will not be insulted, especially when I genuinely tried to answer your questions and believe I did. I do not need to justify anything in the Old Testament, and I never said anything close to our brains are too small to understand. I stated coming from the position that God created everything and made a standard of living, it is up to us to live to that standard, not for God to live to ours.
History is different than science. You cannot use the same method of presentable repeatable proof. If you read extensively, there is enough evidence based on historical facts that show much of what the Bible says is true and more is discovered as time goes on. I personally do not believe in "many worlds" rather I believe there are other dimensions and we are surrounded by spiritual beings.
I do not have to prove to you my God is real. But in the same regard, you cannot prove He is not. I prefaced everything I said with "if you believe" or "if you are a believer this is why we believe what we do.
I am sorry for whatever made you so angry about religion. I answered in the most respectful way, not presuming anything about where you were coming from. If you answer I would appreciate the same consideration or this conversation is over. I do not need to be attacked on something that is sacred and special to me. All I have ever done is state what I personally believe knowing many here do not.
"Do you mean like evidence yet to be discovered? Or do you mean this individuals memory/story is evidence?
If said god was creator, wouldn't it also be aware that menstruation has nothing to do with spirituality and is nessecary for reproduction? Wouldn't said creator/designer be aware of it's own design?
Do you mean like evidence yet to be discovered? Or do you mean this individuals memory/story is evidence?"
Those are the questions I asked in which I've still seen no attempt from you to answer. You must understand, that even if you feel nice about it, it's quite insulting to claim to be addressing someones questions while also ignoring that persons questions. You see, this is a classic tactic from lying politicians used to decieve voters. To claim to address someone's question, then just talk and talk and talk while not answering the question and pretending that what they say makes sense in response. I really appreciate your participation in this conversation. You're demonstrating the tactics of religion. All great reasons to not believe in made up stories of the "supernatural." Even if you don't understand how rude you're being. It's okay for me to point out. It really is quite disrespectful to claim to address someones questions then go on and on and on without addressing said questions. Not that I've got much better to do with my time, but I hope you are getting it now.
You did clearly suggest that my problem was I was looking at it as a human.
Yes, the bible does mention historical events that actually happened. Such as Rome being in power. Or Pontius Pilot being a real person. That means absolutely nothing in whether or not a religion is true. Any human can write about any religion and world events at the same time. That doesn't mean their religion is true. Anyone can do this.
You're right I can not prove god isn't real. That also, is quite meaningless. I can also not disprove unicorns, bigfoot, and the lochness monster. Being unable to prove a religion false is no reason to believe in a religion without evidence. By that logic one would need to believe in most religions, which of course believing in many religions makes even less sense than believing in one religion as they are contradictory to each other.
It's funny how you went from earlier suggesting there might be evidence. Then ignoring questions asked of you about your suggestion of evidence. To now saying that there is no proof. The last one, is finally honesty.
If you want to ramble on about your religion, please feel free to do so. But PLEASE do not address me again unless you are going to actually address something I've said or asked. That is quite rude. How would you feel in conversation if the person replying to you ignored what you said and just rambled?
Not only is christianity false. It is harmful. The following article barely even scratches the surface of the mental harms caused by the bible. Not to mention the physical. The uncountable amount of humans killed for refusing to believe. Including in the americas and central america. Christianity is the most popular largely because they killed populations for not believing, killing the competition. An act as old as the old testament.
But back to the mental effects. At the core of christianity is to teach us that being born a human means we are bad sinners and we must seek forgiveness. It teaches that all humans without exception are bad sinners who must be forgiven. It teaches that we aren't good enough and need help. This is how the human creators of the religion guilt followers into submission.
The good that Christianity can do for children has been trumpeted for centuries; we need to talk more critically about the potential harm it can do, as well.
www.psychologytoday.com