Is it because they genuinely want to work towards peace or, do you suppose it's to try to lure the other country into a false sense of security?
I wonder if there are statistics out there- over who is more likely to break a ceasefire? The country that is pushing for it the most or, the country that just went along with it.
I suppose they'll always defend breaking a ceasefire. This country broke it's promises and violated the deal or whatever.
I wonder if it ever truly ends though. Once there are major acts of violence between one country and another- there is always something to retaliate over. And, so it goes on.
I suppose it's all they can do though- at least try to work towards peace. I just wonder how genuine it is though. Do they truly go into these negotiations hoping they will never attack one another again or, is it more just tactics and political strategy?
I wonder if there are statistics out there- over who is more likely to break a ceasefire? The country that is pushing for it the most or, the country that just went along with it.
I suppose they'll always defend breaking a ceasefire. This country broke it's promises and violated the deal or whatever.
I wonder if it ever truly ends though. Once there are major acts of violence between one country and another- there is always something to retaliate over. And, so it goes on.
I suppose it's all they can do though- at least try to work towards peace. I just wonder how genuine it is though. Do they truly go into these negotiations hoping they will never attack one another again or, is it more just tactics and political strategy?
