"One person's freedom ends where another's begins."
It is our choice when it is a purely personal choice and does not involve anyone else.
This may seem harsh but as long as an agreement is not reached (that we are offered help/we ask for help and the person agrees to help us), we must not mix the other people with our problem.
Always, actually I admire those who choose this method they are courageous and brave. I find it insensitive when people complain about others using this method, like sorry but other people's suicide is absolutely nothing to do with you, pro-lifers who hate on suicidal people and cannot mind their own business are annoying. It disgusts me when they make it all about the driver when we exist in this evil world where there is the absence of guaranteed, peaceful suicide methods available for all.
If we do not respect certain principles ourselves, and therefore contribute to making the world "evil", we should not complain.
"The art of leadership, consists in consolidating the attention of the people against a single adversary"
We can't hate all people by considering them as diverse, so we put them in the same box, it's easier.
Saying that you have to respect others is not being pro-lifer and even if pro-lifer say it, that does not make their arguments invalid.
In this case, blaming the lack of resources is deluding ourselves. We choose to die, then that is our problem, even if it would be hard, it remains our problem to achieve it.
Even if we were alone on a desert island with nothing we can still drown or stop eating, but still happy, we're not there, so there are always several methods available, they are just more painful than the one you wish.
To take up the driver's argument, if he is not held responsible (because in our time, even without having done anything one can be accused of everything) would have to bear the trauma of having "killed" someone . What tells you that he will sleep well at night and not commit suicide later too, believing he is responsible? This kind of story in other circumstances has happened before.
Among the passages, without mentioning the mental consequences, it is possible that some had taken the train for urgent matters (burial of a relative for example... it happened during a blockage by ecologists).
Without forgetting the one who will have the pleasure of cleaning up your remain all over the ground and the train.
it's the government's fault because there was no other option available to them.
This is the kind of argument that can be used anywhere and in any way. This means that we are not responsible for our own actions.
Whether it's the government's fault or not, it doesn't justify implicating other people who have nothing to do with it.