Well, if you commit a heinous murder in a capital punishment state here in the US, the freaking "state" decides that they have a right to end your life. The state had absolutely nothing to do with your creation, yet they still claim that right. If they can claim that right, regardless of the circumstances surrounding it, who, other than you, would have that right, when there are no "heinous" circumstances involved? Part of the reason the state can hold you accountable is because you are judged to be the boss of yourself. If that is true, then it is always true, even when the state isn't making that determination. So, who better than the boss to decide what is right for you?