Chinaski

Chinaski

Arthur Scargill appreciator
Sep 1, 2018
3,277
cnsidrng tht usr ws in cht recntly tellng othr ppl t/ kll thmslves alrdy & tellng evry1 2 stp b-ing s/ misrble slf wld b v surprsd
Indeed, however they were not banned for this, yet again we've seen a user get banned for expressing frustration with the inappropriate use of copypaste output from the forum mascot, within seconds of one of their tedious acolytes slamming the report button and it's becoming an absolute joke at this point.
 
Dot

Dot

Info abt typng styl on prfle.
Sep 26, 2021
2,941
Indeed, however they were not banned for this, yet again we've seen a user get banned for expressing frustration with the inappropriate use of copypaste output from the forum mascot, within seconds of one of their tedious acolytes slamming the report button and it's becoming an absolute joke at this point.

Thy wre prbbly givn signfcnt warnng pnts tho whch wld hve mnt n.e rpeatd b-havr wld tip thm ovr th/ edg

Tht usr ws tellng n.e persn in cht wh/ sd tht thy wantd 2 di tht thy wre all b-ing doomrs & hd 2 stp talkng lke tht

Whthr thr rsponse ws t/ FC or nt tht usr ws sayng th/ sme thng tht thy wre sayng t/ evry1 els wh/ xpressd th/ sme sentmnt alng wth Ncourgng ctb - = jst happnd tht thr mst recnt xampl ws 2wrds FC

SaSu = nt th/ rght plce fr tht persn
 
Chinaski

Chinaski

Arthur Scargill appreciator
Sep 1, 2018
3,277
Thy wre prbbly givn signfcnt warnng pnts tho whch wld hve mnt n.e rpeatd b-havr wld tip thm ovr th/ edg

Tht usr ws tellng n.e persn in cht wh/ sd tht thy wantd 2 di tht thy wre all b-ing doomrs & hd 2 stp talkng lke tht

Whthr thr rsponse ws t/ FC or nt tht usr ws sayng th/ sme thng tht thy wre sayng t/ evry1 els wh/ xpressd th/ sme sentmnt alng wth Ncourgng ctb - = jst happnd tht thr mst recnt xampl ws 2wrds FC

SaSu = nt th/ rght plce fr tht persn
Maybe this person was a total piece of shit, it's still quite remarkable how people can be banned within seconds of expressing unease with the posting style of one user and for it to then be revealed that they were already on a 99.9% warning for significantly greater transgressions. If those deeds were so awful that they can justify a banning it shouldn't take a post like the one made by the OP which was subsequently deleted, which is not even worthy of disciplinary action, to ultimately warrant the ban hammer.

Anyway, I'm not pointing out anything which is not widely understood across the forum here though it is worth highlighting so newer members who are reading this thread can acquaint themselves with the unwritten rules of forum hierarchy.
 
  • Yay!
  • Informative
Reactions: rainwillneverstop and TragedyBornCrimson
AuroraB

AuroraB

Student
Oct 20, 2024
146
Yes, absolutely right
Wait few years and they will allow retired people make the choice
Seriously, just surprised how naive people are
The Christian Right in the USA won't support any time of assisted dyling but liberals, especially the Capitalists, will. They will eventually figure out a way to make assisted dying legal and easy to get rid of the "useless eaters" meaning poor, disabled, those who rely on financial assistance, political adversaries, malcontents, activists, non-conformists, etc. and all those who will struggle with food insecurity in a climate-changed-world.
 
Last edited: