Partial-Elf
Eternal Oblivion
- Dec 26, 2018
- 461
I don't agree that we can't compare the two states, assuming you're not religious. Assuming death is eternal oblivion, I think we can compare those two things. Even though I haven't experienced non existence, I can tell you beyond a shadow of a doubt I'd prefer it to spending the rest of my life being physically tortured or in prison. It's not that far of a leap to prefer eternal oblivion over a life plagued by mental illness and other kinds of confinement."If you kill yourself before you turn 25, we shall... hang your corpse! By the neck! In the gallows!"
While I do understand where the OP is coming from, I can't bring myself to agree. Their argument seems to be based on the inherent assumption that life is, on average, inherently preferable to death, and that people must 'exhaust all options' before they turn to it. They seem to be imbuing life with a sanctity that I do not believe it possesses. There is no generalizable reason to prefer life to death, and thus while it is arguable that life could get better than it is when one commits suicide, there is no way to compare the state of death to this better life - which is the comparison necessary to make a judgment here.
(Sorry for the twisted verbiage, but I believe it is necessary to speak in the generalized abstract here, and not simply say that 'every person is different'. That's also a somewhat weightless statement to use since the point of rules is to try to generate the best possible outcome in the majority of use cases.)
This smart Stanford man says the same thing if you like appeals to authority.