• Hello Guest,

    We will not be following or complying with the Online Safety Bill that was recently signed into law in the UK. This bill will not affect the operations of the site, nor do we have a presence in the UK to receive notice or fines that the UK Government may impose.

    We would highly recommend that all users from the UK get some sort of VPN, and you should petition your lawmakers to let them know how you feel about this piece of draconian legislation.
Oxo

Oxo

♂️ 🇧🇷 🧩 🤘 🐾
Jun 27, 2023
420
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.

In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.

The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: awen
RoundaboutResolved

RoundaboutResolved

Stuck in a roundabout with no exits!
Apr 5, 2023
797
This is the game that never ends,
It just goes on and on my friends.
Some people starting playing it,
Not knowing what it was.
And they'll continue playing it forever just because,
This is the game that never ends...
 
  • Love
Reactions: LoiteringClouds
CrestfallenMima

CrestfallenMima

Staring into the abyss
Dec 28, 2021
160
THE END IS NEVER THE END
THE END IS NEVER THE END
THE END IS NEVER THE END
THE END IS NEVER THE END
THE END IS NEVER THE END
 
Oxo

Oxo

♂️ 🇧🇷 🧩 🤘 🐾
Jun 27, 2023
420
0c18kk8nwacb1.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: LoiteringClouds
LoiteringClouds

LoiteringClouds

Tempus fugit
Feb 7, 2023
2,790
This is the game that never ends,
It just goes on and on my friends.
Some people starting playing it,
Not knowing what it was.
And they'll continue playing it forever just because,
This is the game that never ends...
Hello @RoundaboutResolved,
Thanks for encouraging words of wit.
Now we see how this game has evolved -
It's the symbol of our sheer grit.

Don't attack this website to get hailed.
Pro-lifers have attempted and failed.
They can't beat us, though they are brutal.
They deny the truth - life is futile.

We will weather every pouring strain,
Pain will turn into gain, Rain will reign!
For our fate, we know who will decide -
Glory to mighty Sanctioned Suicide!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RoundaboutResolved
LoiteringClouds

LoiteringClouds

Tempus fugit
Feb 7, 2023
2,790
Victory is...
M y pipe dream.
I rrational, and
N ot attainable
E xcitement.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Oxo
LoiteringClouds

LoiteringClouds

Tempus fugit
Feb 7, 2023
2,790
I ...
W rote off two cars
I n a year.
N ow what?
 
ShinyScissors

ShinyScissors

Professional Procrastinator
Feb 8, 2023
30
Metacognition Is thinking about thinking but is it possible for your thinking to be thinking about thinking? See, for metacognition to be true youre thinking has to be thinking about thinking but that means that thinking is thinking about thinking and and then thinking is thinking about thinking- so it's a never ending cycle of thinking about thinking and having that thinking thinking about thinking. For example if you're thinking about dogs, that thought process stops there but whenever you're thinking about thinking it's a never ending cycle so does that mean if one of your thinkings is thinking about thinking but that thinking ISNT thinking about thinking.. does that mean it breaks the cycle of metacognition making it therefore invalid?
 
  • Love
Reactions: LoiteringClouds