Did anyone figure out why the son wanted to commit suicide? Now it seems as if people decide to commit suicide because they come across a forum and not the other way around.
Doesn't sound like the documentary is about SS though, as people are not being encouraged to commit suicide here.
And D definitely doesn't sell N for 90£ either.
My condolences go out to the family that lost their son.
They are talking about SS, that's one of the people that's been crusading against this site for years now, and still refusing to accept that people don't kill themselves because of a website, and still telling lies to "journalists" who are willing to spread it around for uniformed normals to gawk at.
("Jeremy" is also featured in this video a former SS user known as BipolarGuy, the long drama behind that is too much for me to recount, but he's a dick.)
"If he hadn't found that site, he'd still be here," is just exactly the logic of someone who is blinded by grief and misplaced rage. We're just the scapegoat. As if by banning this site, you are somehow "saving" people, like millions of people don't kill themselves and have killed themselves without any knowledge of this website whatsoever. It's literally doing nothing, just taking away the community for people who are struggling with the exact same things as their deceased offspring, yet in their eyes we're monsters who forced them to drink SN when they were the picture of health and happiness before ever finding this site.
Censorship is the first line of offense for angry mobs, just get rid of the thing you don't like without even trying to found out what it actually is or why it exists. Any laws that these "grieving parents" are trying to make to get SS banned will inevitably just be another way to try and limit autonomous adult's exposure to content the government and/or big tech deems as a no-no, and we know how well that tends to go historically. The ones in the US (Fixthe26) try to target Section 230, which essentially means website are not responsible for the third party content of its users, and since that part of the law is what helps huge social media giants stay afloat, there's pretty much no way they will be able to get it struck down or anything.