If it was an important topic to OP it should have presented it in an open minded respectful way. The first post was closed minded, and a personal attack on parents in the group. It was lacking empathy, compassion, and was intended to hit below the belt. I gave a pretty tame response considering I am a parent.
You may have perceived it that way, but the fact is that the maker of the thread has remained respectful despite strong views about a sensitive topic.
What one could definitely not say about most of the answers on page 1 and 2.
The person was even accused of being a pro-lifer and creating a flame thread.
I agree, however, that it is a flame thread, the only difference being that the person has made a generalised statement on a controversial issue and he being the target of the flaming. He did not attack any parent directly, and even in the next few pages it was discussed that the subject is very nuanced. Like i said, the only flame here was directed at him.
On the pro-lifer accusations, if you throw accusations just because you are very emotional, you should not participate in this thread and "discuss" your already formed opinions somewhere else.
He has not broken any rules, if you are preaching to be pro-choice, you shouldn't force this topic to be closed.