As others have said, it is generally
very difficult to suicide in psychiatric hospitals due to them being totally designed, engineered and staffed in such a way as to prevent suicides. And even if you do manage to attempt somehow, you run a high risk of being discovered (due to staff supervision) and rescued (due to proximity of medical staff and equipment). And if you do attempt, it will be taken as an indication of your illness and risk level, and you will be held for much longer.
It's generally easiest just to play the game and make the most of your time there. Behave well, say and do the right things, and your stay will be as short as it can be. Plus, a lot of people do find either the hospitalisation or the medications can be beneficial.
That's just a ridiculous statement, with absolutely
no basis in truth. There will always be more potential patients than available beds in almost any public psychiatric system, and so the hospitals have
no financial incentive for 'holding on to a patient longer'.
You may well disagree with the entire notion of involuntary hospitalisation, or believe that psychiatric hospitals keep people too long because of poor clinical judgements. Both those positions are at least arguable. But please don't try to suggest there is some conspiratorial financial agenda. That's just tinfoil stuff, and sets a poor and distorted example for any forum members who may genuinely need inpatient psychiatric care.
View attachment 38582