SN or drowning, which method would you choose?

[iwantitalltoend]

If you could choose between sn and drowning, which one would it be and why? While sn seems like a more peaceful death, it's a new method and not the most reliable and certain method, drowning is more certain and proven to work, more people died from drowning than from sn. After you drink sn it's not certain what will happen, if you'll die or survive in a worse condition since if you don't know the exact purity of the sn and if it's pure enough to be lethal then you don't know for sure if it will work, even if the source you bought from claims the sn is pure. It's true that drowning isn't a peaceful death but if no one saves you then it's more sure that you die, even if it's not 100% sure it's at least a more lethal method than sn. Would you choose sn and not be sure if you die or would you choose drowning and be more sure that you die?

 

[Alexandra0]

SN. There aren't many options. There are always risks and you can never be 100% sure of anything. But you have to take risks otherwise you won't know if it will work or not. Drowning seems like a harder way to me. Everyone is different and each person has their own method. My life is too terrible and I want to try it as soon as possible, maybe I'll get lucky

 

[FuneralCry]

I'd personally prefer the poison method, drowning to me sounds like such an agonising, very difficult to succeed with method, all I want is a poison to bring me permanent peace from all suffering, I just want to never suffer ever again and there's just so much suffering in existing, I wish I had access to reliable poison.

 

[derekWest]

Drowning but with inert gas asphyxia before.
Or both...

 

[VoidButterfly]

SN for sure, drowning to me sounds quite traumatic and I'd rather take the more peaceful option.

 

[eljuicioporlaestafa]

If you could choose between sn and drowning, which one would it be and why? While sn seems like a more peaceful death, it's a new method and not the most reliable and certain method, drowning is more certain and proven to work, more people died from drowning than from sn. After you drink sn it's not certain what will happen, if you'll die or survive in a worse condition since if you don't know the exact purity of the sn and if it's pure enough to be lethal then you don't know for sure if it will work, even if the source you bought from claims the sn is pure. It's true that drowning isn't a peaceful death but if no one saves you then it's more sure that you die, even if it's not 100% sure it's at least a more lethal method than sn. Would you choose sn and not be sure if you die or would you choose drowning and be more sure that you die?

SN is more reliable than you think. It's true that a lot of stores claim they sell >99% purity when they don't, but you can get it tested. Drowning is painful and survival instincts will get in your way.

 

[iwantitalltoend]

SN is more reliable than you think. It's true that a lot of stores claim they sell >99% purity when they don't, but you can get it tested. Drowning is painful and survival instincts will get in your way.

The aquarium tests and blood test aren't very reliable because they don't show the exact percentage of the purity, the aquarium tests just give you an idea of the level of nitrites present in sn. Other than these tests how do you think sn can be tested to see its exact purity? Maybe sending it to laboratory? But I never sent anything to a laboratory before and I don't know what I would say to the people working there especially since sn is a dangerous substance and I don't know how many people own sn, probably not many, maybe saying I use it for meat curing but would that be believable enough, would they ask for proof for why I have sn and why I want to see its purity? Also why would stores claim they sell pure sn when in fact they don't?