• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
R

rabbitjack

Member
Dec 6, 2025
64
I read your response and replied that if consciousness is fundamental and matter just an appearance within it, then what we call "becoming unconscious" is just a figure of speech. Consciousness itself is never lost, it is just the particular pattern within it that you call "you" that is temporarily halted.
But if "you" is halted, if there is no "you" to confirm consciousness, who says that it exists or is fundamental? "You" only say it is fundamental while experiencing it. What if all "other people" that will also confirm it were just your imagination and they end with "you"? This line of thinking approaches nondualism where the suggestion is that nothing has ever happened.
 
E

Endlichkeit

Member
Feb 26, 2023
97
But if "you" is halted, if there is no "you" to confirm consciousness, who says that it exists or is fundamental? "You" only say it is fundamental while experiencing it. What if all "other people" that will also confirm it were just your imagination and they end with "you"? This line of thinking approaches nondualism where the suggestion is that nothing has ever happened.
As I said, the "true experiencer" (universal consciousness) never dies because "I" is merely the content of the experience of it. Other "sub-observers" will continue to exist within it, possibly expressing the same ideas as me.
Yes, could be that all "other people" end with "me", but what I'm describing is not solipsism, since my ego is not fundamental here.
And nondualism does not imply that nothing has ever happened.

All of this is, of course, unfalsifiable. I have simply tried to come up with a worldview with the fewest inconsistencies. For me, this resolves many "paradoxes" in quantum mechanics and the hard problem of consciousness.
 

Similar threads

R
Replies
25
Views
446
Suicide Discussion
rigsid
R
nopurposeinanything
Replies
2
Views
179
Suicide Discussion
waterbottle3929
W
mordumfan
Replies
0
Views
103
Suicide Discussion
mordumfan
mordumfan
a65b
Replies
16
Views
863
Suicide Discussion
blacksand
blacksand