Discussion Religion carries a message?

[ish]

In all my years of study I have determined there are two main "gods" which preside over this world. Now when I say God I do not mean a personified being like a human. But by the more general conceptualization, a being which is measurably more powerful than human beings, and is not constrained to the limitations of human beings. These beings are not like us their version of being is diffrent. One is biological evolution and the second is technology. As Darwin observed a seemingly insignificant mutation can compound over time to create diverse species. Evolution then is not the cause of change but the God that evolves from change over time. Christian's are quick to point out that it is very improbable that humans emerged from random chance. Which further complicates their point which is god made them. Well if human complexity is so improbable to evolve from random interaction the complexity of a God evolving before is even less probable a notion. Rather I believe gods evolve as evolution points out everything residing in our universe does. Now the God of evolution is not all powerful it need not be. It need only be measurable more powerful than a human being to control matter or exist outside time. It a repeating self replicating pattern just like us is as much a being as us. If its effects are tangable it to must be tangable.

The second God is the God of technology. A much smaller God at this point because its evolution has been short compared to the 13.5 billion year evolution of evolution itself. But it too has the trait of compounding returns and accelerates exponentially. Technology is at war with nature technology's aim is to become a more powerful being than that of nature. You can see the shift in world power from one to the other around the time the Anglo saxons started what would be become a revolution in Europe and a war in America for freedom freedom from nature. The beginning of the church marked a change in the way people observed status and power. Power was no longer held by nature and its rules but by the rules of "god" the God of technology. We went from biologically appointed power to power from subjectivity. This marked the doom of the human race. What is the ultimate goal of technology? To become the God of nature. To control that which controls, but there is a catch that isnt possible for a human. So we create artificial intelligence. Not just in the form of computers but in most technology to help humans surpass human capacities to control evolution. And science is winning this war but at what cost and for what purpose? Because the God of technology evolved from the God of evolution. The difference between science and evolution is that science is supposed to be an objective perspective that is the idea to have such a completely objective perspective you can see through your bias. But the problem is that science as a concept is entirely subjective not objective. Science in a dogmatic way is acknowledging the thing it tries to disprove the "supernatural" it is in itself if it exists the attempt to achieve supernatural abilities. So how could one have a completely objective perspective even if I manage to curve my bias it's still a humans eyes so if I use a computer it's still a humans perspective of a computers perspective. Evolution has already won because the only way to have an objective perspective is to not exist. That is the only way to be free of bias judgement and misunderstanding that is the ultimate aim of tecnology the death of humanity the death of subjectivity which means the death of science

From what I know artificial intelligence
man-made will never match intelligence
human, for the simple reason that after its creation
will not be able to evolve on its own. Sooner
humanity will create something like ROBOCOP - it's biotechnology.

 

[Pupuce]

From what I know artificial intelligence
man-made will never match intelligence
human, for the simple reason that after its creation
will not be able to evolve on its own. Sooner
humanity will create something like ROBOCOP - it's biotechnology.

AI is quite recent, and we can at the moment create robots that will educate other robots to do a specific task, and robot that will adapt to a change on their work. After all we have neural networks that can get a face within a picture it never saw. It is not completely unimaginable that at some point they'll be our equals as beings.

 

[ish]

Consciousness is not language. Language is a way to communicate. Consciousness allows to apprehend your surroundings. Those are totally different. Not being able to communicate with someone/something doesn't mean it has no consciousness. And it is utterly wrong to deduce that we are the only one with consciousness just because others doesn't understand us and we can't talk to them.
It is humbleness to admit you don't know, yes that i agree. It is wrong to feed ignorance with fairy tale. We, through the knowledge we have as a specie, have a way to explain everything believers claim to be the work of god without any supernatural being, or disprove such claims. God is only needed to compensate ignorance.

You first point it being in the mind of peoples, I assume you don't mean physically present in everyone heads because that would just be "Hey god is an organ", which is weird and it couldn't be immortal. As for spiritual existence, well spirituality has never been proven, and seeing as how we are prideful it could just be another lie like the fact we are an objectively superior species.

Your second point is bizarre. They are inanimate, so they don't need to feel anything so they are not equipped to feel. And since apparently animals don't have consciousness as you define it, why would inanimate objects?

Your third point is intriguing. How come you could get to a conclusion about something outside of anyone's knowledge/understanding?

Undoubtedly, all fauna representatives are aware. We know this because consciousness depends on the senses and the brain.
However, only homo sapiens evolved at home as a result of evolution
organs that make sounds that have developed into speech. In addition to the larynx, vocal cords, lungs and mouth, the brain plays a dominant role in speech, without awareness brain
does not exist. From the TORA (Old Testament) we have information that the first man Adam name all the creations of the earth - he gave them names. Adam in Hebrew also means earth (inhabitant of planet earth).

God is present in the consciousness of all living people, even in
atheist consciousness, the personal attitude of man does not matter
for god. It exists there as information (this is what our senses allow
and the brain - what limits us). Instynky that we have (like the rest of the animals) and our knowledge (its quantity and level) condition ours
conduct, induction or communication is likely
man - God at this level. I defined soul as psyche + memory. Although in individual individuals at the time of death
psyche + memory disappear, this is each individual of the constantly existing population
people have their own psyche + memory. All living people, not these people what died, they have souls. All these souls together making up GOD (living immortal).
So far, other species on Earth have not evolved speech, writing and civilization beyond homo sapiens, and this puts us in the first position of evolution (the act of creation).

My mind and my senses limit my cognition like everyone else
human. I am well aware of this. It's thanks to science
Human civilization has made tremendous progress, but even so
science does not claim that people already know everything and have achieved everything.
So far, the situation in many areas invariably looks like this -
finding an answer to a question creates more
questions.

 

[Pupuce]

"However, only homo sapiens evolved at home as a result of evolution" I don't even know what that's supposed to mean.

The tora is a religious book. Religious books are bonkers. We know for a fact that there was no first man.
And there is no reason to think God exist, even less as a part of everyone. Your argument is unfalsifiable and baseless. Besides, the god of tora supposedly created the world, but since the world existed before men, it's nonsense to say it is a part of human soul.

"So far, other species on Earth have not evolved speech, writing and civilization beyond homo sapiens, and this puts us in the first position of evolution (the act of creation). " You are just being an overly prideful being. We are not first in evolution, because evolution do not ranks living being. Only creationist are stupid enough to think they are better than everything else. As stated before, other species have speech, but you dismiss it only because it is not yours, same goes for civilization. You are just showing how utterly and monstruously haughty you are just by decided by your own standards that you are superior.
Your argument of god baing a part of everyone is as valid as if I were to say there is a chinese teapot orbiting jupiter. You can't prove that I'm wrong therefore I am right. You can't just claim the existence of god.

 

[ish]

[QUOTE = "Pupuce, post: 393334, członek: 7210"]
That is still wrong. Human consciousness is as unique as cockroaches consciousness is. Most pets have different levels of sound they can produce and that can be understood by their masters, they also can be taught orders, elephants have come to have a particular sound to alert others about bees, and birds, just birds. Parrot can mimic human sound and associate them with meaning. Also gorillas (namely Koko) has been taught sign language and has, when she learned that Robin williams died, signed that she was sad. Human consciousness is not by any means particular, superior or unique. Talking about it like it's a wonder is just disingenuous.
That account mostly for oral language. Exist also body language. Like cats closing their eyes in front of you is a sign of trust, or dog with their tails between their legs being afraid.
I should also mention ants and their societies.
[/QUOTE]


We should go back to the concepts in terms of again
communication (information transfer).
Language - as a body organ and language as a term
linguistic. So far, science has confirmed
also ways of communicating in the world
fauna with the help of smell, color. In case of
parrots and Koko confuse training with linguistics.
(How many words a parrot can remember, no
talking about their understanding?)
In this respect, homo sapiens is unique.
Anecdotal scientific theories in a wiki article:
Theory of speech formation as a result of evolution link-https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_przypadkiem_sapiens
In ant societies, individuals differ (queen, soldiers, workers), man is different (universal).

 

[Pupuce]

We should go back to the concepts in terms of again
communication (information transfer).
Language - as a body organ and language as a term
linguistic. So far, science has confirmed
also ways of communicating in the world
fauna with the help of smell, color. In case of
parrots and Koko confuse training with linguistics.
(How many words a parrot can remember, no
talking about their understanding?)
In this respect, homo sapiens is unique.
Anecdotal scientific theories in a wiki article:
Theory of speech formation as a result of evolution link-https: //pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_przypadkiem_sapiens
In ant societies, individuals differ (queen, soldiers, workers), man is different (universal).

Language is not an organ because language doesn't fit the definition of organ.
You weren't born with a full understanding of human language, you were trained in basically the same way animals are trained. Yes sure they are not as proficient as us, but so are people with mental deficiency. If language was innate, we would all be speaking the very same language. The only part of language( the ability to recognize emotions in someone) that is innate is also existing in every living beings. Once again homo sapiens is no more unique than any other animal, plant or fungus. That's just you putting arbitrary value on what you can do because you want to. Why don't you mention longevity or survivability? Because we aren't the best at that. And in humanity people differ as well, like men and women having naturally different roles. Our society is not better, it's different. We are not better, we are different.

 

[ish]

"However, only homo sapiens evolved at home as a result of evolution" I don't even know what that's supposed to mean.

The tora is a religious book. Religious books are bonkers. We know for a fact that there was no first man.
And there is no reason to think God exist, even less as a part of everyone. Your argument is unfalsifiable and baseless. Besides, the god of tora supposedly created the world, but since the world existed before men, it's nonsense to say it is a part of human soul.

"So far, other species on Earth have not evolved speech, writing and civilization beyond homo sapiens, and this puts us in the first position of evolution (the act of creation). " You are just being an overly prideful being. We are not first in evolution, because evolution do not ranks living being. Only creationist are stupid enough to think they are better than everything else. As stated before, other species have speech, but you dismiss it only because it is not yours, same goes for civilization. You are just showing how utterly and monstruously haughty you are just by decided by your own standards that you are superior.
Your argument of god baing a part of everyone is as valid as if I were to say there is a chinese teapot orbiting jupiter. You can't prove that I'm wrong therefore I am right. You can't just claim the existence of god.

TORA is a written document. At the time it was created, there was no separation of religion and science, as we have now. That's why in the past
there was only SCIENCE. According to the Hebrew calendar, we now have the year 5779, this coincides with the dates scientists set for the beginning
the origin of thecharacters in the Sumerian civilization (3760 BC).
In homo sapiens, speech learning occurs naturally in the process of upbringing within the same species. In addition to speech and language
in linguistic terms, people also learn "body language" and other forms of communication. No species other than humans
on earth, he does not communicate with himself by means of a language (consisting of words-words-sentences-expressions), he does not use writing.
In this sense, we are unique and this distinguishes us from other species. In the wiki wiki
-https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_przypadkiem_sapiens
a summary of the scientific work on how and when (about 200 million years ago) this process began.
In terms of longevity and survival, I don't know if you mean the human species or a single individual?
Male and female occur in many species. Society and civilization - even modern science knows only one species - man.
"Community" of ants, bees - I have my doubts. Ant colony, ant nest, herd of animals, group of animals - I don't have one
doubts.

 

[ish]

The beginnings of Christianity

The matter of different interpretations of various aspects of information about Jesus Nazarene is extremely interesting,
what he said and taught, and how different translations made over the centuries have changed dramatically,
and sometimes even distorted the original, original meaning of individual parts of the text.

The Aramaic manuscripts that are being gradually discovered are original source documents that are quite well confirmed.
Beginning with the reign of Constantine, around 325 CE, dramatic changes occurred in the interpretation of the text during
translation from Aramaic to Greek and then into Latin. In later years, a translation into Old English and later into modern
English was created.

The Aramaic language makes no distinction between the mean / way and purpose, inner quality and external action.
Both aspects exist at the same time, as in the saying: "what you sow, this you reap." When Jesus speaks of the "Kingdom of Heaven"
he has thoughts of the kingdom within and the kingdom in or between us. Also the "next" is inside and outside
as whole or Self. There are no arbitrary boundaries between the spirit, body and soul.

The Aramaic language has (like Hebrew or Arabic) different levels of meaning. Words are organized and defined in accordance with
with a poetic system in which each word can have different meanings.

Jesus - He did not write any text personally (no information on this subject).
- there is no mention or remark that he speak or order to pray to himself. What we know rather for sure is that he prayed in
Aramaic to God the Father - Abwûn (original Aramaic text and translations available on the internet).
- In Islam, Jesus is only a prophet with a rank lower than Muchamad.
- What can the name Jesus mean? (ishu) in my opinion the closest association is - man(ish).

 

[ish]

For a better understanding of the world from the early Christianity, I put the symbolism:

Fish.

The universe with the earth in a central point.

Abwûn prayer.

The cross was used as a symbol after 300 AD.
Until 300 AD and before it was treated like us
today we are treating the rope with a hanging loop.

 

[ish]

ISLAM

Suicide in Arabic
(انتحار)(aintihar),(منتحر)(muntahar)suicide

Killing a person in Arabic is referred to as:
(قتل الرجل)(qutil alrajul)killing a human(man)
(قتل امرأة)(qutil aimra'a)killing a woman
(قتل الروح)(qutil alruwh)killing the soul
(قتلة الروح)(qutlat alruwh)soul killers - suicides

In the KORAN itself there is no specific reference to suicide, there are attempts to interpret some fragments
-((قال الله تعالى: (ولا تقتل النفس التي حرمت الله إلا الحقيقة)Allah Almighty said: (And don't kill the soul that forbade Allah, except the truth)
-(قال تعالى (ولا تقتل نفسك ، أن الله رحمك) النساء)The Almighty said (and don't kill yourself, that God was merciful to you) women.
in hadith
-(وهو أمر جيد بالنسبة لي ومات إذا كان الموت جيدًا بالنسبة لي)which was good for me and died if death was good to me.
narrative - I don't challenge anyone to die to hurt, but I tell God that I will not now be what was good in my life
and I will die if death is good for me.
-(قال ابن حجر: "لقد أُخِذ منه أن جريمة الإنسان ضد نفسه هي جريمته ضد الآخرين في الخطيئة ، لأنه ليس ملكًا له على الإطلاق ، لكن الله تعالى لا يتصرف فيه إلا ما يصرح به)Ibn Hajar said: "It was taken from him that the crime of man
against himself as his crime against others in sin because he is not his own property, but God Almighty
does not work in it differently from so what it him authorizes. "

 

[ish]

"Young souls seek answers in secrets, laws and rituals.
Mature souls look for them in science, mathematics and evidence.
And old souls look for them within themselves. "
Look inside yourself if you can simultaneously search for answers everywhere?

 

[ish]

In summary, every religion is trying to determine the relationship of man to life, in this sense even atheism is a religion, science is also a religion.
All the time since the creation of civilization, people ask themselves the same questions and are unable to come up with anything new.
Since the writing (Sumerians) to this day, countless ideas and their combinations have been created (today we are able to read even very old records),
we know from their content, that what after death is a product of the human mind, caused by desire, expectation , hope, fear and rebellion.
All ideas, such as immortality of the soul, visions of what after death (hell, purgatory, paradise, heaven, reincarnation), are nothing but what this
science fiction is for modern science (conquest of the universe, extraterrestrial civilizations, parallel worlds, UFO etc.
even the theory of evolution lacks the set of evidence - empty spaces)
The human mind is not able to break through the shell it is in (senses + brain + time).


Human thinking ........

Everything was already there - said Rabbi Akiba ben Josef almost 2,000. years ago. This is still valid.
In every highly developed religion that is Science, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, you can find objective
position on key issues such as life, death, existence.
What does GOD say about that? .................................................. ..........
Is life on earth-evolution an experiment of GOD? .....................
What is justice if good and evil are relative? .........
.................................................. .........
.................................................. ....
...............................................
Does BOG exist? - in my opinion, yes, and the proof of this is the fact of every person with awareness (soul = psyche + memory)experience GO (HIS).
We have hell, paradise and intermediate states in life
real, just like reincarnation. After our death, we have a state of heaven-nonexistence-nothing.

 

[ish]

In this forum, Kuolema reminded an interesting quote from Tolstoy:
"God is ALL infinite. Man is only his finite manifestation.
I will develop it as follows:
God is the infinite Everything that man knows is a finite part.
God Himself really exists. Man really manifests. He in time, space and matter.
The more the manifestation of God in man (individual life) unites with the manifestations (life) of other beings,
the more man exists. Unification with the lives of other beings is achieved through love understanding
(ability to empathize with other beings ).
God is not love, but the more love there is, the more man reveals God and the more he really exists ...
We recognize God only when we are aware of His manifestation in us. All conclusions and guidelines based on this
consciousness should fully satisfy both our desire to know God as such and our desire to live
based on this recognition. "
Like the moon is the Self. See it at all. Diversity is a product of faulty vision (understanding).
Because there is only one moon, so there is only one Self in all (complete consciousness is the full moon,
this consciousness in which the moon is not visible - it is self-awareness - the ego (I) of man).
I also mention that the human self as the moon only reflects the light of the sun - Human Attempts to Imagine Part of God.

 

[woxihuanni]

No no, it's good for the spirit! a learning experience? No pain no gain? Ahhh crap - it's all BS propaganda. All of it.

Not in a spiritual or religious sense, but some pain I think is essential for growing into a stable adult and learning to think for yourself. I don't mean trauma, obviously, but coddled people are not the ones who have contributed most to our intellectual inheritance.

I think the taboo in religion against suicide is not based on anything like growth anyway, it is based on the idea that you don't get the quit the game God(s) set you in. It is an act of pride, literally satanic.

 

[Soul]

Not in a spiritual or religious sense, but some pain I think is essential for growing into a stable adult and learning to think for yourself. I don't mean trauma, obviously, but coddled people are not the ones who have contributed most to our intellectual inheritance.

I think the taboo in religion against suicide is not based on anything like growth anyway, it is based on the idea that you don't get the quit the game God(s) set you in. It is an act of pride, literally satanic.

But is the taboo in religion, or in the "religion industry" that comes up with interpretations and commentaries and proclamations claiming all kinds of stuff that was never in the original sources?

 

[woxihuanni]

But is the taboo in religion, or in the "religion industry" that comes up with interpretations and commentaries and proclamations claiming all kinds of stuff that was never in the original sources?

This is a very familiar topic of discussion, and my stance is that yes, it is in religion. I know some original sources that are full of horror, but that is a moot point anyway. Because if religion keeps breeding that industry again and again, right there there is a problem. Similar with psychiatry, though it can be helpful where it is based in neuroscience, the inherent politics in it makes it problematic.

 

[Soul]

I see your point, @woxihuanni. I'm looking for a way around that just because I like faith, which doesn't necessarily have much (or anything) to do with religion per se.

Of the established religions I'm familiar with I like Taoism best, even though the so-called legalists twisted it up beyond recognition and it has a popular form that appears to be more juju superstition than anything like faith. Buddhism has been another longtime favourite, because I'd never heard of any religious wars involving Buddhism, but what Myanmar "Bhuddists" are doing to religious minorities there has sent me back to the drawing board.

Maybe I'll stick with my homemade Jewish-Taoist awareness that we're surrounded by praiseworthy things and blessings, and sit in the corner grateful. 8]

 

[woxihuanni]

I see your point, @woxihuanni. I'm looking for a way around that just because I like faith, which doesn't necessarily have much (or anything) to do with religion per se.

Of the established religions I'm familiar with I like Taoism best, even though the so-called legalists twisted it up beyond recognition and it has a popular form that appears to be more juju superstition than anything like faith. Buddhism has been another longtime favourite, because I'd never heard of any religious wars involving Buddhism, but what Myanmar "Bhuddists" are doing to religious minorities there has sent me back to the drawing board.

Maybe I'll stick with my homemade Jewish-Taoist awareness that we're surrounded by praiseworthy things and blessings, and sit in the corner grateful. 8]

It just terrifies me to think there might be something more out there. Because there is no reason why it should be good. If I knew reincarnation was a thing, I would immediately go insane. Just let me be rid of existence.

 

[ish]

What is satanism (the name Satan is derived from Hebrew (שטן) stn - opponent).
It doesn't really refer to God. "God is ALL infinite. Man is only his finite manifestation."
God is also human ideas, images and ideas. Since it is all infinite, it contains all ideas and theirs
opposites (for example, love and hate) in one (MONOTEISM).
Satanism that needs an opponent (god) makes polytheism by itself. Satanists are hedonists at all costs.
Satanic practices rely on the cult of instincts (ego-self) of followers - a state of consciousness in which the moon is not
visible (karma) *, without their understanding.
Suicide is only an act of free will of a man if he manages to overcome his own instinct for survival.
Undoubtedly, courage is needed to overcome your own ego (yourself).
Every life ends in death anyway.
Can suicide be called hedonism (pleasure)? - I would call them rather resignation, withdrawal, choice (lesser evil?).

* Karma - Literally translated it is "work" or "action".
True and definitive understanding of Buddhist karma is possible
only through a deep insight into the impersonality (anattā)
and Causality (paticca-samuppāda) of all phenomena of existence. - based on WIKI.

 

[ish]

I want to thank everyone who said
in this thread for questions and comments.

 

[ish]

A few notes about the human soul.
From the distant past to the second half of the 17th century, mankind did not know the concept of atmosphere (gases such as oxygen, nitrogen, chlorine and hydrogen
discovered only after 1771, others were discovered in the second half of the 18th century). Before humanity realized role the atmosphere in the process of life , associated with the body's breathing function. Has elapsed a long time. Earlier, level of knowledge he associated breathing with the soul , it could not be precisely defined .
It was believed that in the act of creation, God gives life - "He breathed life into him", death - "gave up the spirit."
This is how the concept of soul, present in every living organism, was born. Greek thought introduced the concept of ego-psyche.

It is puzzling that nowadays most people are aware of what atmospheric air role in the process of breathing, and at the same time believes "old idea" in the immortality of the soul.(Marketing and advertising of religion?!?!) Whether can think and associate?
With the death of a person, the breathing process stops, resulting in brain death, the mind and memory cease to exist.
What remains of man is matter (corpses) and genes in the next generations, and what is his individual intellectual achievements
(it remains in the memory of the next generations).

 

[ish]

It just terrifies me to think there might be something more out there. Because there is no reason why it should be good. If I knew reincarnation was a thing, I would immediately go insane. Just let me be rid of existence.

I am also terrified by this factual status (status quo) and
what is the role of man. Cognition is somehow
assigned to every life. I think that
better to know through good than through evil.
Unfortunately, the burden of knowledge may be too great,
to carry him and can't back down to the "blind faith".
I came to this forum myself looking for information and methods
for myself.

 

[ish]

Rationalism and Empirysm.
From my knowledge, I conclude that none
man has no second chance at life.
Death is the end of everything for man.
Each civilization had an impact on people the living in
her the , people shaping their view of "life" after death.
This is most evident in civilization
of ancient Egypt - tombs on the west sideThe Nile
cost (absorbed) much of the state's income.
In translations of Egyptian papyri
and ostrakonas a few thousand years ago dated I found the text:
"from the afterlife no one has returned and told yet
how is there"
This is still valid.

 

[ish]

a human being^


................................machine(human GOLEM)^

 

[ish]

I did not find a "god's statement" in any religion
prohibiting suicide. I found only interpretations, records
relating to general issues,
these came from people who had a "social interest" in mind.
From the analysis of relations of people rescued after the act of suicide
One of them caught my attention
- the person described an internal voice that asked: "is it really
do you want? "The voice was soft and gentle.
Many people have described the loss of consciousness as
"total darkness" - literal nothing, no feelings whatsoever.
These with relate to hanging - about 70% of all suicides.
I consider the relations of this method to be the most reliable because
you can easily determine moment the disappearance of consciousness (cutting off the blood supply to the brain).

 

[ish]

^^^^
Time.
We, everything that surrounds us, the whole real world and the universe,
is dependent on time. I remind you that time is a value
fixed (in one direction). From this state of affairs
the principle of God's immutability is proposed.
The soul of a single person (psyche + memory) exists
inseparable only during life and not after death.

 

[ish]

Good and evil
As for examples of good and evil, it is not about the example itself, but about the mechanism of thinking. I will give the following:
Experiments were carried out during World War II
"medical on people" consisting in starving, injection
various substances, deliberate disease control, exposure
for extremely low or high temperatures etc. (Shiro Ishii, Josef Mengele, Grigory Majranowski). I will also mention eugenics and such
ideas on how to get a cross between a human and a chimpanzee
(Ilja Iwanowicz Iwanow, Raymond Pearl) Information available online.
Can one always say - THE GOAL (consecration)sanctification THE MEASURES?
The victims of the experiment suffering for the benefit of future generations?
Being(living) on earth for both Religion and Science
there is for suffering for future generations.

 

[ish]

In fact, free will is an illusion, conscious
decision (choice) is made without raising awareness,(understanding)
what the role instinct (nature) plays in it.
The main (basic) instinct of life is
survival instinct, all other instincts arise
from this instinct. That is why it is so difficult to take conscious
decision on suicide. The most important decision in life
against the basic nature of life.

 

[ish]

Monotheism is more a way of understanding God.
Judaism - is not there with this problem
"Szema Israel, Adonai Eloheinu, Adonai Echad"
(listen to Israel, the Lord (is) God, the Lord (is) One).
In Islam there is a saying about infidels (kafir) - they add companions. to God.
Christianity introduces confusion and chaos, 1 in the trinity
(son-man, God, Holy Spirit), (son, Father, Holy Spirit)
(son of God, God, Holy Spirit) etc.for in the text interpretation on also has influence of iconography.
In some paintings the Holy Spirit is depicted as a woman or as Satan.
In my opinion the definition of the Trinity -
(1) God
(2) present in consciousness= Holy Spirit
(3) human (people).=son-man
This is due to the specificity of the Aramaic language, which Jesus Nazarene used, and this is what he meant by - One God.
He it this way - he talked about God.
Analyzing his life and his message, I came to the conclusion that he was a man like everyone, he was not a god but as
man was as close to God (mind consciousness) as it is onlyman (generally) perhaps - earthly body allows.
He died like everyone. His immortality lies in the fact that for 2000 years he has been "living" in the consciousness of the next living -
generations of humanity. When he said - "I am going to my Father's house to prepare a place for you" - he meant the place into by,
memory(in mind) next generationsthe living.
Buddha was probably thinking of many gods -
many aspects of one God, and speaking of becoming a Buddha he had on thinks most likely a man reaching a state -
full consciousness regarding self.

 

[a.h]

OK without reading the results I saw 13 faces. I don't think I am schizophrenic, maybe it's because I just took 6g of magic mushrooms. Waiting for it to kick in
View attachment 15096

You missed the side profile of a smiling man in upper left and the man with huge eye brows. ;) I think that everyone see 12 + some extra noses, lips, eyes (not whole face). Humans are prone to see faces and in this most are clear.