pony No.2
Pony
- Oct 22, 2024
- 28
"Your life has value!"
If it does, then why am I seen as not valuable when I'm depressed and can't get up to do anything, and then I lose my job because guess what, I'm not a valuable employee. If you're not a valuable employee then you get no money. What makes a person's life valuable if they have nothing they want to offer? What's valuable about being suicidal for years? And according to how everything costs money and how everything revolves around working, not really. If you can't work or find alternatives to making income, your life, according to how society operates, is not valuable.
"It gets better!"
Depending on several factors, no it probably won't. Learning to cope and live with your pain and trauma is not getting better, it's being compliant with what society wants you to do with your own life or else they'll lock you away until you're "sane". Also define better, being happy doesn't mean you're better, being healthy doesn't mean you're better neither. You can be unhealthy and happy, you can be healthy and not happy and be depressed. Forcing someone to live so they can get "better" is not a guarantee if they will get better. Loophole.
"You have to keep going!"
A person with free will doesn't have to do anything, whether or not if society likes it. Nobody is obligated to keep living regardless. And for what? To keep contributing to a world that doesn't like it when a person makes their own decisions?
"Suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem!"
If someone's suicidal or depressed, and especially for years, chances are their problems aren't temporary. And lots of mental illnesses, physical disabilities, and neurodevelopmental disabilities, aren't temporary. Trauma, depending on the person and the type of trauma they received and how it's affected them, can be permanent. Temporary problems can also cause permanent problems, so that argument makes no sense.
A question I have for pro lifers is, why does society force traumatized, or extremely depressed individuals, to live while knowing they don't have any alternatives to offer those people that are guaranteed to make them, "better" or stop their suffering, when making the choice of commiting suicide is a much better option than staying and dealing with more problems they don't want to face, needlessly suffer and be depressed?
They care about the value of life and preserving it, not the individuals personal beliefs or struggles, and definitely not what they're going through. Because they think they can fix every. Single. Fucking. Thing. When they can't.
Living without choice is a life without a voice, that person is alive now that you stopped them, but now they have to face the problems and irreversible causes for their suicidal thoughts. Did you really save them at all? And save them from what? A life they don't want for valid reasons? You're not saving anyone, you're just preventing them from making a choice that'll guarantee no more suffering, unlike living.
If it does, then why am I seen as not valuable when I'm depressed and can't get up to do anything, and then I lose my job because guess what, I'm not a valuable employee. If you're not a valuable employee then you get no money. What makes a person's life valuable if they have nothing they want to offer? What's valuable about being suicidal for years? And according to how everything costs money and how everything revolves around working, not really. If you can't work or find alternatives to making income, your life, according to how society operates, is not valuable.
"It gets better!"
Depending on several factors, no it probably won't. Learning to cope and live with your pain and trauma is not getting better, it's being compliant with what society wants you to do with your own life or else they'll lock you away until you're "sane". Also define better, being happy doesn't mean you're better, being healthy doesn't mean you're better neither. You can be unhealthy and happy, you can be healthy and not happy and be depressed. Forcing someone to live so they can get "better" is not a guarantee if they will get better. Loophole.
"You have to keep going!"
A person with free will doesn't have to do anything, whether or not if society likes it. Nobody is obligated to keep living regardless. And for what? To keep contributing to a world that doesn't like it when a person makes their own decisions?
"Suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem!"
If someone's suicidal or depressed, and especially for years, chances are their problems aren't temporary. And lots of mental illnesses, physical disabilities, and neurodevelopmental disabilities, aren't temporary. Trauma, depending on the person and the type of trauma they received and how it's affected them, can be permanent. Temporary problems can also cause permanent problems, so that argument makes no sense.
A question I have for pro lifers is, why does society force traumatized, or extremely depressed individuals, to live while knowing they don't have any alternatives to offer those people that are guaranteed to make them, "better" or stop their suffering, when making the choice of commiting suicide is a much better option than staying and dealing with more problems they don't want to face, needlessly suffer and be depressed?
They care about the value of life and preserving it, not the individuals personal beliefs or struggles, and definitely not what they're going through. Because they think they can fix every. Single. Fucking. Thing. When they can't.
Living without choice is a life without a voice, that person is alive now that you stopped them, but now they have to face the problems and irreversible causes for their suicidal thoughts. Did you really save them at all? And save them from what? A life they don't want for valid reasons? You're not saving anyone, you're just preventing them from making a choice that'll guarantee no more suffering, unlike living.
Last edited: