W
watchingthewheels
Enlightened
- Jan 23, 2021
- 1,415
so I'm not the only one who thought of this before... there are actually so many logical and practical solution to humanity problems.. but most of these solutions are sacrileges lol
Antinatalism isn't about overpopulation tho. Old people are harmless from the pov of antinatalism if they're old enough not to reproduce anymore.65 because my dad is 65.
Being terminated at 30 sounds like a privilege.
But I think 50yo would be the perfect age to die. If there are any antinatalists on this website, I suggest you review your philosophy and become an anti-agist instead if you want to solve overpopulation. For the sole reason that children are cuter and more useful than elderlies and their diapers.
Where's the contradiction?Settle down, Thanos...
(blah blah blah, hoomans are EVIL, there's too many of us...and yet, the people saying that STILL haven't CBT'd yet...)
Why, thankyou. ❤❤65 because my dad is 65.
Being terminated at 30 sounds like a privilege.
But I think 50yo would be the perfect age to die. If there are any antinatalists on this website, I suggest you review your philosophy and become an anti-agist instead if you want to solve overpopulation. For the sole reason that children are cuter and more useful than elderlies and their diapers.
longeivity is falling in western countries and that was before the pandemic factor is calculated. We shouldn't be surprised because humankind has made a stinking mess. 120 is just bizarre. The human genomics matrix would inevitably collapse by way of disease.being an anti-aging makes more sense to me than being an antinatalist.
I don't get why people in the news get excited when they hear that humans might be able to reach 120yo.
there's a reason why villains in stories are the ones after immortality.
For example, millenials in China chose to not have children so that they can take care of their aging parents. Since they can't afford both, children and aging parents.
but boomers had no issues sacrificing younger generations.