Thanks for uploading, scales! I really appreciate you sharing it with the community so we can have a look.
Really starting to get sceptical of Nitschke's recent stuff. It feels like Exit do not put as much effort into their recent writings. This is incredibly poor quality work, and lazy. There are reasons not to employ ondansetron with some of the methods advocated in the PPeH, never mind dramamine. The wording around their meto change is weird too.
And finally, many people would have simply no idea what the side effects column of that table even means.
Cavalier advice through and through - in Australia, where many of Exit's members reside, you will not get metoclopramide because you are concerned about seasickness. In fact, metoclopramide is not very effective for it. Maybe Nitschke does not think the anti-emetic is important before the N for some reason (given that the chapter is primed for N), or that ondansetron will suffice, but it will definitely not for e.g. the inorganic salts. I really have to question what was going on here. Not all of it is wrong, but the correct and useful information was already available.