Yeah, that made-up name for the site wasn't editorializing at all to skew opinions.
I love how the journalist acted so moral and circumspect about not sharing the name of the site, but then mentioned that Vice had published an article about the site in 2015. Really difficult to figure out the site name, so, so hard. Good job covering it up for the well-being of all. I think they'll be nominated for the next Nobel Peace Prize for sure.
Here's what I thought was the best part of the article, and I mean that sincerely, no sarcasm at all. I'm glad it was included:
"In the U.S., there is this very poorly funded public health infrastructure around suicide," [April] Foreman [a psychologist on the executive board of the American Association of Suicidology] said. "While a child was on that site, it may have made things worse. But their child was suicidal before. They didn't just show up at that site. As angry as we can be about these websites, we're holding these websites so much more accountable than the public health system."
I would say it's more than just the public health system, but the entire governmental "social" system, such as child protective services, which for a child is usually jumping from the frying pan into the fire, not only endangering them even worse but in fact making some more prone to suicide as a way to escape the hell of their lives. Or services that are supposed to protect victims of domestic violence but instead protect and even enable the perpetrators -- how often do we have members posting that their only way out of an abusive relationship is to end their lives?